audiomuze;567175 Wrote: > Let me start off by saying I agree with everything Pat suggested.
I believe that it can be implemented fairly easily with only one additional field in the sound/track table, and one in the album table. This field is just a big space for text, that we use to store the unique fingerprint of the song/track/album. Perhaps we would want to have the same field in artist/group/etc. But the key design change of SBS is that they have to stop nuking the DB every time they do a scan. Its critical that the DB be considered important. The rest of the recommendation engine can be run out of either separate tables or a separate schema of tables. -- pfarrell Pat http://www.pfarrell.com/music/slimserver/slimsoftware.html ------------------------------------------------------------------------ pfarrell's Profile: http://forums.slimdevices.com/member.php?userid=200 View this thread: http://forums.slimdevices.com/showthread.php?t=80910 _______________________________________________ discuss mailing list [email protected] http://lists.slimdevices.com/mailman/listinfo/discuss
