Triode wrote: 
> 5) Specific audio output drivers - this bit is the only bit which I
> think needs to be specific to the wandboard based community squeezebox
> hardware.  This will require us to develop whatever is necessary to
> drive the hardware John is planning.  [I think John and Clive have been
> talking on this]

That's all I seem to have been doing, talking..... After I spoke to you
I did some brain scratching. I think I'm very close to getting a known
name in Linux kernel circles (who happens to be a friend) on-board
specifically for the kernel parts that John needs. Hopefully I should
have a definite one way or the other very shortly.

I've seen mention of XBMC in this thread (and another). Please,
no........ We need to deliver something, preferably before April 2016,
not go off at a tangent. ;)

With regard to software, LMS is the server backend. (Like it or loathe
it. Until someone has a replacement up and running it's no use doing
anything other than using what we have today.) Squeezelite is the client
player. That, along with John's DAC design and the Wandboard will
deliver a high quality standalone headless player. It should have a web
interface to be able to configure the network interfaces (eth & wlan)
and allow the configuration of squeezelite without having to directly
edit a text file. If there is some sort of GUI (music player controller)
actually on the device, available via a HDMI port, (Jivelite), that's a
bonus, rather than a necessity. I mean there are already enough ways of
being able to control it, from a phone, from a pad, from a computer,
that a built-in GUI controller is a luxury rather than a necessity.
Well, that's how I see it anyway......


------------------------------------------------------------------------
JackOfAll's Profile: http://forums.slimdevices.com/member.php?userid=3069
View this thread: http://forums.slimdevices.com/showthread.php?t=98179

_______________________________________________
discuss mailing list
[email protected]
http://lists.slimdevices.com/mailman/listinfo/discuss

Reply via email to