JackOfAll wrote: > I've seen mention of XBMC in this thread (and another). Please, > no........ We need to deliver something, preferably before April 2016, > not go off at a tangent. ;) I only used XBMC as an example of a successful community-driven software project. I certainly wouldn't want us to tie ourselves to it in any shape or form.
JackOfAll wrote: > With regard to software, LMS is the server backend. (Like it or loathe > it. Until someone has a replacement up and running it's no use doing > anything other than using what we have today.) Totally agree, but I'd like to think we can ensure the hardware, drivers and software being delivered -now- won't prevent the opportunity for an LMS replacement -in the future- by locking us to it. ------------------------------------------------------------------------ simbo's Profile: http://forums.slimdevices.com/member.php?userid=11481 View this thread: http://forums.slimdevices.com/showthread.php?t=98179 _______________________________________________ discuss mailing list [email protected] http://lists.slimdevices.com/mailman/listinfo/discuss
