Michaelwagner wrote: > > I wonder if someone's power network solution mightn't be better than > 802.11 for an alarm clock - boom box kind of thing. Since it's not > truly wireless, it's still plugged into the wall, why not use the wall? >
True. I was trying to merge the "Squeezebox clock radio" product requirements with the "Squeezebox boombox" requirements. While omitting 802.11 would save cost on a Squeezebox clock radio device, it would be more than offset by the cost of the "network over power" equipment. This stuff is quite expensive and very poorly available in this country. -- ___________________________________ Mark Lanctot ___________________________________ __________________________________________________________ Find your next car at http://autos.yahoo.ca _______________________________________________ Discuss mailing list Discuss@lists.slimdevices.com http://lists.slimdevices.com/lists/listinfo/discuss