Michaelwagner wrote:
>
> I wonder if someone's power network solution
mightn't be better than
> 802.11 for an alarm clock - boom box kind of thing.
Since it's not
> truly wireless, it's still plugged into the wall,
why not use the wall?
>
True. I was trying to merge the "Squeezebox clock
radio" product requirements with the "Squeezebox
boombox" requirements.
While omitting 802.11 would save cost on a
Squeezebox clock radio device, it would be more
than offset by the cost of the "network over
power" equipment. This stuff is quite expensive
and very poorly available in this country.
--
___________________________________
Mark Lanctot
___________________________________
__________________________________________________________
Find your next car at http://autos.yahoo.ca
_______________________________________________
Discuss mailing list
[email protected]
http://lists.slimdevices.com/lists/listinfo/discuss
