I have heard the story about the NFB asking/telling/advising MS to stay away from implementing a screen reader as well. I've also heard others claim that the NFB had nothing to do with it and it was a matter of MS simply being unable to make a screen reader that performed as well as JAWS or Window-Eyes.

In any event, I find it interesting how the NFB has responded to Apple's VoiceOver efforts. It has not been exactly a kind or encouraging reaction, as I know a few people on this list can attest to as well from their own experiences. Apple was accused of making VoiceOver to prevent lawsuits and all that jazz, and I heard it said that VO would never evolve or progress. Thus, we now hear about the improvements coming in Leopard and it is a fact that there is an entire team dedicated to VO's development.

So, here is Microsoft PR and not really a lot of substance. They have had Voice Recognition in the past and it's not like it's earth shattering considering that Macs have had it as well and like just about everything else, it's been better.

I fall into David's line of thinking. Nothing to see here in the overall state of accessibility's. I just wish that blindness groups and organizations would, at least, give Apple some true credit and acknowledge their efforts, as opposed to making blanket statements that VoiceOver is bad for blindness business.

Take Care

             John D. Panarese
        Managing Director
Technologies for the Visually Impaired, Inc.
9 Nolan Court
Hauppauge, NY 11788
Tel/Fax, (631) 724-4479
Email, [EMAIL PROTECTED]    net
Internet, http://www.tvi-web.com

AUTHORIZED DISTRIBUTORS FOR PORTSET SYSTEMS LTD, COMPSOLUTIONS VA, PREMIER ASSISTIVE TECHNOLOGIES, INDEX, PAPENMEIER, REPRO-TRONICS, DUXBURY, DANCING DOTS AND OTHER PRODUCTS FOR THE BLIND AND VISUALLY IMPAIRED

AUTHORIZED APPLE BUSINESS ASSOCIATE
MAC VOICEOVER TRAINING AND SALES




On Sep 7, 2006, at 9:55 AM, John Heim wrote:

The National Federation of the Blind (NFB) told Microsoft to *not* include a screen reader in their operating system. There is Narrator which allows you to get started but it's not something you can use to get your job done. The NFB felt that including a screen reader in Windows would drive companies like Freedom Scientific out of business and that Microsoft's screen reader would be inferiour to existing screen readers like JAWS.

That seems like contradictory logic to me. But you know how it goes... If the NFB tells Microsoft to not include a screen reader, they're not going to. And after all, who knows if Microsoft really would have done it.

I argued on the NFB's list that Voiceover is proof of the invalidity of the NFB's point of view.

Another thing I argued was that Apple might regain a toe-hold in schools and colleges with Voiceover. Those institutions have to supply accessible computers to students and a Mac with voiceover is a very cost effective solution Instead of having a lab with 10 or 20 Windows machines and just 1 with JAWS installed, they can have 10 or 20 Macintoshes all of which are usable by a blind student.

I wouldn't be surprised if someday Microsoft ignored the NFB and improved their screen reader to a point where you can actually do your job with it.



----- Original Message ----- From: "John Weir" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: "General discussions on all topics relating to the use of Mac OS X by theblind" <[email protected]>
Sent: Wednesday, September 06, 2006 10:34 PM
Subject: Re: Accessibility look at Vista


I am not much impressed. All that the article talks to is already done by the MAC. Voice recognition has been there for some time and the enlarging of letters and other items are all in VoiceOver. I didnt see anything about screen readers. Vickie Weir

LARRY WANGER wrote:

Hi,

I ran across this article this evening and thought I'd share it. I know, its a Mac list but some of the steps Microsoft is taking to incorperate and promote accessibility are intreaguing. Now, we know Microsoft and the hype is just that but it will be interesting to see this. Even more interesting to see some of the other access improvements in Leopard and where we end up.

http://www.stltoday.com/stltoday/business/stories.nsf/technology/ story/B30BAA80C251A2D7862571E1006E85F9?OpenDocument

Visit my home page at http://www.disabilitynation.net and subscribe to The DisabilityNation Podcast.








Reply via email to