Apple accessibility has been pretty open with many who have contacted
them that they are working to smooth out access issues in some of
these products. iTunes, one of the company's flagship products, is
nearly entirely accessible, and has steadily improved with every minor
update released in the last year. Logic has come a long way, as has
the iWork suite. They aren't perfect, but Apple is clearly doing
everything in their power to improve access, with tons of results to
show for it. I think rallying obnoxious blind consumers against
Apple, a company who has also proven their commitment to access, would
be as counter productive as it would to do the same against the
developers of ProTools, as you so eloquently laid out earlier.
Josh de Lioncourt
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
...my other mail provider is an owl...
On 8 Jan, 2008, at 6:09 PM, Rick Boggs wrote:
Hello all,
Sorry for the rant in the last message. The bickering and
complaining on that subject gets me going.
Anyway, why don't we demand accessibility from Apple on its own
applications? After all, Apple makes the OS and sets the parameters
for development. Why not generate huge amounts of consumer demand
for accessibility to Logic Audio and ITunes?
I'm in favor. Who wants to take the lead there?
I'm too busy with other irons in other fires to organize that one.
Rick Boggs
