Hey Rick, and the rest of the access army haha,

Had I been home when the pro tools thread started, I would have posted about Logic straight off. Just replying to it now to register my interest on the Logic front. I'm a Pro Tools boy at heart of course, but at the end of the day the software is just a means to an ends, and Logic is just as capable. I don't know anywhere near enough to get the ball rolling much with a corporation the size of Apple, but it strikes me that we must have a bit more pulling power considering Logic is their product and Voiceover / Mac OS is also their product. Add to that how much it gets my goat when Apple's own products lack access from their own screen reader, and you can see why I'd be happy to work under the wing of anyone who takes on the task, be it testing - or in light of the direction the thread is taking - camping outside Apple HQ on hunger strike haha.

Anyway, good idea, I hope there's someone with more knowledge of the field than me who wants to take it on, and if so then this is from a green but keen potential servant to the cause. Man, the ranting talk is infectious!

Scott - www.swagproductions.com


----- Original Message ----- From: "Rick Boggs" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: "General discussions on all topics relating to the use of Mac OS X by theblind" <[email protected]>
Sent: Wednesday, January 09, 2008 2:09 AM
Subject: Logic Audio: Let's get access


Hello all,
Sorry for the rant in the last message. The bickering and complaining on that subject gets me going.

Anyway, why don't we demand accessibility from Apple on its own applications? After all, Apple makes the OS and sets the parameters for development. Why not generate huge amounts of consumer demand for accessibility to Logic Audio and ITunes?

I'm in favor.  Who wants to take the lead there?

I'm too busy with other irons in other fires to organize that one.

Rick Boggs



Reply via email to