Sure, leave a message if I am not around and I'll give you a call back.
On Jan 9, 2008, at 3:57 PM, Slau wrote:
Shaun,
Last spring, Digidesign issued a statement which you can read at
http://www.protoolspetition.org
Before the holidays, I requested an update to be published but
haven't yet heard anything. Although I was planning to attend the
NAMM show to meet with Digi, I'll not be able to attend. As for
what's "in the pipes," as you put it, I'm hoping Digidesign can
answer your question. Nobody's hesitant at all to say that there's
currently no way to access Pro Tools on a Mac with VoiceOver. That
should be clear based on everything we've said up until now. If
you'd like, I'll gladly call you after my session's done, perhaps
around 6 PM EST.
----- Original Message ----- From: "Shaun Jones" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: "General discussions on all topics relating to the use of Mac OS
X by theblind" <[email protected]>
Sent: Wednesday, January 09, 2008 3:40 PM
Subject: Re: ProTools: The path to accessibility
Josh, Rick and Jerry aren't you all friends. Birds of a feather
flock together. I think Cheryl said it best. If you don't want to
clutter the list then lets conference call. Lastly I will try it
using Window Eyes and see how it works. I am not saying to file a
suit or anything of the sourts. What I am saying is that we need
accessibility and it is coming slowly if not at all. What do you
three have in the pipes for accessibility for the Mac today? You
can call and answer this question in case you can't admit on list
that the answer is nothing to date.
On Jan 9, 2008, at 3:23 PM, Josh de Lioncourt wrote:
Your questions have been answered multiple times in this thread.
You can use it with WIndows. Not yet with Mac. As far as facts,
you've ignored most of them in this thread.
As someone who does hope to eventually use Pro Tools with
VoiceOver, I ask you, sincerely, don't undermine Slau and Rick's
work by filing misguided lawsuits.
I could bring up projects that I've spearheaded that have
resulted in employed blind individuals too, but it is irrelivant,
and I don't feel the need to boast.
Josh de Lioncourt
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
...my other mail provider is an owl...
On 9 Jan, 2008, at 12:12 PM, Shaun Jones wrote:
Josh I didn't assume anything. Asides from the beta on Tiger that
appears to be very private the only access you guys have is
Outspoken which is outdated and Mac OS 9 which is 5 or 6
releases from Leopard. I don't care about the money issue
because my debit card works just fine. To bring a end to this I
want to know from you if I can use the copy I purchased for my
son or not. If so just say that and move on if not then when. If
no one on this list can answer that then allow me to try
something different. I haven't done anything counter productive
if anything I have produced results. If you care to hear about
the results ask Verizon how many blind people they now employ
because of my efforts. Blind people earning a living not waiting
on a hand out. What exactly is the current state of
accessibility in Pro Tools for Tiger. That is the question, now
what is the answer? Not my grammer or anything else just the
facts.
