I agree as well, Rogers over here in Canada seems to be handling things the same way.
On Jul 12, 2008, at 8:10 AM, Scott Howell wrote:

Well you may be correct, but regardless, Apple really doesn't want to be upsetting customers. I'm not sure if they feel it might be a risk to purchase more bandwidth, don't have the hardware and software to handle the larger volume of traffic even if a temporary increase, not doing proper load balancing, or what the situation is. Either way it's important for any company when performing such a massive upgrade and rollout of a new product to be prepared to handle the load. I'm only speculating on why or what could be the cause since really no one knows except Apple. It could even be an unforeseen problem they just haven't made public. It's just a bit unfortunate to hear how the media is making light of the situation and AT&T isn't really helping matters. I guess Apple probably is feeling like their face is being a little rubbed into it. grin

On Jul 12, 2008, at 7:47 AM, John Moore wrote:

I agree Scott. I appreciate that they're trying to do this, but they overdid it. They probably don't have enough bandwidth or server space for this. I honestly think less people will buy the IPhone because of the downtime.


Scott Howell
[EMAIL PROTECTED]






Reply via email to