I truly think Voice-over should change the vo-keys to be vo-key. To me it's ridiculous to have to press two keys before you've even pressed another key making it 3 just to activate a screen reading command. Ah well, you guys have gotten use to other such stupidities before. So I guess I'll have to as well if I want to use the mac smile. Please don't flame me as I still love my mac pro smile. But I just hate having to press more keys than I should.
-----Original Message----- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Jacob Schmude Sent: Saturday, 15 November 2008 11:04 AM To: General discussions on all topics relating to the use of Mac OS X by theblind Subject: Re: webkit Hi Esther Actually ,they do work, but there as been a change in the Webkit code base. For access keys, you must now press ctrl+option and the letter. Needless to say this is annoying as all get out, as it interferes with just about every Voiceover key combination around. On Nov 14, 2008, at 19:58, Esther wrote: > Hi Mike, > > Yes, if you start up WebKit it will look as though Safari is > running, except that things like VO-Shift-M on Web page links will > bring up the contextual menu and other such fixes. You really are > running Safari, but the underlying engine powering it has some > fixes. On the slightly negative side (for me), the access keys for > the Mail Archive site for this list at: > > http://www.mail-archive.com/[email protected]/ > > don't work under WebKit right now, so I can't use Control-I to shift > the list of posts to a set of links indexed by date, and Control-C > to shift the listing back to links ordered by content into threads. > (Or navigate through threads to read the next post with Control-n > and the previous post with Control-p; or use the analogous commands > of Control-f and Control-b to move forwards or back by date). This > went away in September, but the fix will appear in an upcoming > WebKit build. Until then, I fire up Safari to read and search the > Mailing List archives for this list, but use WebKit for most > everything else web-related. > > Cheers, > > Esther > > > On Nov 14, 2008, at 2:13 PM, Mike Arrigo wrote: > >> Hi everyone. I decided to give the latest nightly build of web kit >> a try, one thing I noticed, when running the webkit application, it >> shows as safari, and even calls itself safari 3.1, is safari still >> loading but using the newer web kit engine instead? So far, it's >> working really well. >> > >
