Ian Lynch wrote: > It seems to me that if Wikipedia can give pretty well unfettered access > and stay in one piece the degree of "lock down" in OOo is excessive.
Indeed. > Is this not something you could bring up at the next Community Council > meeting? I'm sure you would get a lot of grass roots backing. If in the > end its to do with Sun legal or something at least we would know. Well, "website" is a "project", and the lead is Louis. The reasons why people don't have access to the website are not infrastructural, nor are the reasons why they don't feel they have influence. So here we are talking about a project that is not working out. In general, the council is not supposed to intervene in projects, except in extreme circunstances. And when it does, it's ugly. The most recent time the council intervened on a particular project was when Sam Hiser was removed as marketing lead. And I think it's fair to say it was ugly. Given this, what do you suggest? Cheers, -- Daniel Carrera | I don't want it perfect, Join OOoAuthors today! | I want it Tuesday. http://oooauthors.org | --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
