Hi >Louis Suarez-Potts wrote: > >> Besides yourself (and you are not a developer), > >By definition, anyone who hasn't signed the JCA is not a developer. So >let's stick to a more useful concept, like "potential developer". >Unless you mean to imply that I am unable to program, which is very >rich comming from someone who knows less programming than I do. I >/could/ be a developer if it weren't for the JCA.
Uhm, I actually wasn't being hostile, so am a little taken aback by your evident hostility. I am, as people on this and other lists aware, totally unable to program. But my point was rather that I have no evidence that developers have refused contributing to OOo because of the JCA. I know you have, but, as mentioned, you are not a developer--I see now because of the JCA. Again, do you have instances of developers refusing to contribute to OOo because of the JCA? best, louis --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
