Robin Laing wrote:
I do see Chad side of the argument. There is an ISO standard for date
formats but many different formats are still used. Heck I have seen
three different formats on one single form. People like to use what
they are used to.
Well, date formats are not going to severely hinder interoperability.
Personally I prefer the '03 Jan 2005' format because it is inmediately
recognizable by any English speaker, but for files I use the ISO
2005-01-03 format because it makes files sort correctly.
I will now sent either PDF or ODF documents. If someone asks for a
different format, I give them the link to OOo.
:-)
That's what we are doing on the INGOTs website. Every downloadable file
(and there are several) is either PDF or ODF. Usually both, but some are
only ODF because they are useless if they are not editable.
Cheers,
Daniel.
--
DEMAND __ __ __ http://opendocumentfellowship.org/petition/
| ||__)|__|\ | - Tell Microsoft to support it
|__|| |__| \|DOCUMENT - Sign the petition
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
