On 03/25/2008 11:40 AM, Barry Smith wrote:
> -----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
> Hash: SHA1
> 
> Hi, Kim.
> 
> Kim Gerback.  If you did not send the original email, then
> please disregard this message.  Your email address was
> apparently used to spoof this email to a email list run by
> a free alternative to Microsoft Office (Open Office) which
> does more that Microsoft Office, and is completely FREE.
> On the other hand, If you did actually send this misguided,
> uneducated message, please read this email as well as any
> other emails that are replies to this email.  Hopefully,
> you'll learn of the errors contained in your statements.
> 

Please do not do this. There appears to be nothing at all "spoofed"
about the email. If you'd bothered to look at the headers:

<http://www.openoffice.org/servlets/ReadMsg?list=discuss&msgNo=62621&raw=true>

you will see that Kim posted using a valid ip address corresponding to
his/her email address. See the part that says:

Received: from smtp120.sbc.mail.sp1.yahoo.com ([69.147.64.93])

My (polite) recommendation would be that you send an apology to Kim, and
the list. Sending msgs such as yours to an already unsatified
'experimenter' does nothing to enhance OOo in the OP's mind, and I would
imagine that it will only serve to further his/her opinion that OOo
"sucks".





---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Reply via email to