On Wednesday, April 02, 2014 14:20:05 Chris Egeland wrote:
> I recognize that it's not a proposal, I'm just discussing a concern I
> have before we're a month and a half into discussion about the topic.
> 
> I understand the problem that this is attempting to address.  I
> understand pretty much everything that's been brought up in discussion
> about this.
> 
> I just want to know how often you, Andrew, personally think it'll get used.

I'm not Andrew, but I'd use it maybe once or twice every few months.

I don't build workbenches every day, though I think I assembled quite a few of 
the ones we have now.

There's a few more workbenches that I'd like to chop up too, but I'm very 
comfortable with and capable of using a regular circular saw instead of some 
big-ass piece of equipment. Not having one isn't a problem for me, and having 
one would only be a minor benefit to me.

> 
> Chris
> 
> On 4/2/2014 1:58 PM, a l wrote:
> > This isn't a proposal yet. Just further discussion on an Item that came up
> > at the meeting.
> > The problem we're trying to solve is large format wood handling. When we
> > enclose the machine shop/tool room we either have to expand its footprint,
> > get something like a panel saw, or arrange the table saw so wood can be
> > outfed through a window/door.
> > This is justified by concerns for people who want to build their own, or
> > expand SynHak's work bench population. The other concern was that once the
> > shop is enclosed there won't be enough room to flip a 4x8' sheet of
> > anything.
> > I agree $1000 dollars is a lot to spend on something that won't get a lot
> > of use. Many of the kits come with everything but the saw so we could
> > conceivably dedicate one of our many circular saws to this purpose and
> > save
> > some money. Perhaps a stop-gap solution is, we build the frame for a pane
> > saw but use guide boards rather than the expensive rails and counterweight
> > arrangements. This requires more finesse on the operators part but if it's
> > an infrequently used too $40 in lumber might be all we are willing to
> > spend
> > on it.
> > As far as the foot print concern, many kits and commercial products have
> > shortened or collapsible arms so it only takes up the full 8' when there's
> > a board in it. All examples I've suggested are vertical with beds tilted
> > at
> > high angles so they could be stored against a wall or otherwise placed out
> > of the way.
> > 
> > regards,
> > Andrew L
> > 
> > On Wed, Apr 2, 2014 at 1:40 PM, Chris Egeland 
<[email protected]>wrote:
> >>   How often do you foresee such a saw being used?  We have three or four
> >> 
> >> bandsaws, two tablesaws, countless circular saws, a scroll saw, probably
> >> a
> >> reciprocating saw or two, and countless other machines that can be used
> >> to
> >> cut wood.  I rarely ever observe any of them being used.  Granted, I'm
> >> not
> >> spending 30 hours a week at the space anymore, either.
> >> 
> >> I ask because if you're talking about something that's going to take up a
> >> significant portion of floor space and cost us $1000 or so, I would like
> >> to
> >> know the answers to these questions before providing input on such a
> >> proposal.
> >> 
> >> Chris
> >> 
> >> 
> >> On 4/2/2014 1:22 PM, a l wrote:
> >> 
> >> The price difference for the heavy duty panel saws mostly looks to be
> >> quick: change fittings for the saw mount, crosscut capacity, extended
> >> length, and various cutting guides like lasers and mid-bed clamps. There
> >> are a few kits and add-ons that allow for miter cuts but most panel saws
> >> seem to be limited to cross- and rip-cuts.
> >> 
> >> If we want to do complicated cuts perhaps something like a shop-bot is
> >> something we should be considering. Some of the kits do offer router
> >> mounts
> >> but I don't know if their rails are designed for 2-axis motion.
> >> 
> >> -Andrew L
> >> 
> >> On Wed, Apr 2, 2014 at 7:37 AM, Torrie Fischer <[email protected]> 
<[email protected]>wrote:
> >>   On Wednesday, April 02, 2014 02:21:17 a l wrote:
> >>   
> >>   Well the lumber yard quality ones do start at 3-5k. But they have long
> >> 
> >> beds/arms and can do off angles. The cheap kits are limited to 90* cuts
> >> 
> >>   for
> >>   
> >>   the most part and don't have as good of bearings or dust collection
> >>   
> >>   options.
> >> 
> >> If I understand correctly, to get non-square cuts, the saw itself usually
> >> rotates?
> >> 
> >> I wonder if we could rotate the wood instead by having a ramp of sorts
> >> that
> >> can be clamped down at various angles.
> >> 
> >>   I think there's a balance to be struck, some of the wood working forums
> >> 
> >> suggest buying a kit for the bearings and rails since a bunch of the
> >> 
> >>   plans
> >>   
> >>   for sale rely on u bolts and emt conduit which may not hold tolerances
> >>   if
> >> 
> >> someone is ripping the length of a sheet of plywood.
> >> 
> >> Regards,
> >> Andrew L
> >> 
> >> On Apr 2, 2014 12:19 AM, "Torrie Fischer" <[email protected]>
> >> <[email protected]>>> 
> >>   wrote:
> >>   
> >>   On Tuesday, April 01, 2014 21:25:42 a l wrote:
> >>   
> >>   Before I had to leave the meeting early there was discussion about
> >>   
> >>    how
> >>    
> >>    to
> >> 
> >> retrofit the machine shop to limit dust &c. In that discussion the
> >> 
> >>    topic
> >>   
> >>   of
> >>   
> >>   
> >>   plywood/large format wood handling came up and a panel saw like what
> >>   
> >>   lumber
> >>   
> >>   
> >>   yards have was suggested. New/Used ones apparently cost thousands of
> >> 
> >> dollars so I sought out a DIY solution.
> >> I've found a few kits that come in varying degrees of fully assembled
> >> 
> >>   with
> >>   
> >>   
> >>   prices between ~$300-$1000. There are also a few designs for sale
> >>   
> >>    from
> >>    
> >>    backissues of woodworking magazines($10/issue). Given enough time
> >> 
> >> staring
> >> at the ones at the home improvement store and pictures online we
> >> 
> >>    could
> >>    
> >>    probably make our own without buying plans. Or should we save our
> >>    
> >>    time
> >>   
> >>   and
> >>   
> >>   
> >>   just buy a kit?
> >> 
> >> At any rate I think it's a viable solution.
> >> 
> >>   I did think it was a bit odd to hear that one would cost $5k.
> >> 
> >> Shouldn't be too hard to build one using some rails a saw mount and
> >> 
> >>   frame.
> >>   
> >>   We're all about building stuff like that anyways, so its odd that we'd
> >> 
> >> think
> >> to buy one.
> >> 
> >>   http://panelsawsrus.com/
> >>   
> >>    http://www.ebay.com/itm/DIY-Sliding-Panel-Saw-Hardware-Kit-/2811910797
> >>    78
> >>    
> >>     http://www.widgetworksunlimited.com/Panel_Saw_DIY_Frame_Kit_p/ww-pane
> >>     l_saw
> >>   
> >>   -d>
> >>   
> >>   iy.htm
> >>   
> >>     http://www.woodcraft.com/Product/2082569/33113/Safety-Speed-Cut-Panel
> >>     -Pro->
> >>   
> >>   2
> >>   
> >>    -Saw-Model-PRO2K.aspx http://plansnow.com/dn3099.html
> >>    
> >>     http://www.finewoodworking.com/workshop/tip/build-your-own-panel-saw.
> >>     aspx
> >>    
> >>    http://www.rockler.com/woodworking/Panel-Saw-Kit
> >> 
> >> If someone is vehemently against spending the cash and spare circular
> >> saw
> >> on one we could also situate the table saw near the garage door-side
> >> 
> >>    of
> >>   
> >>   the
> >>   
> >>   
> >>   shop and just open the planned( they are planned aren't they?) double
> >> 
> >> doors  and put an outfeed table in the hallway when we need to make
> >> 
> >>    big
> >>    
> >>    cuts.
> >> 
> >> happy hacking!
> >> Andrew L
> >> 
> >>   _______________________________________________
> >> 
> >> Discuss mailing
> >> [email protected]https://synhak.org/mailman/listinfo/discuss>> 
> >>   _______________________________________________
> >> 
> >> Discuss mailing
> >> [email protected]https://synhak.org/mailman/listinfo/discuss
> >> 
> >> 
> >> 
> >> _______________________________________________
> >> Discuss mailing
> >> [email protected]https://synhak.org/mailman/listinfo/discuss
> >> 
> >> 
> >> 
> >> _______________________________________________
> >> Discuss mailing list
> >> [email protected]
> >> https://synhak.org/mailman/listinfo/discuss
> > 
> > _______________________________________________
> > Discuss mailing list
> > [email protected]
> > https://synhak.org/mailman/listinfo/discuss

Attachment: signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part.

_______________________________________________
Discuss mailing list
[email protected]
https://synhak.org/mailman/listinfo/discuss

Reply via email to