I feel that I have to reply to this as I was specifically named.

One I have to say that if you were truly on hiatus then you would have 
delegated your duties to someone else as you would have no dealings with SYNHAK 
during the hiatus. I find it quite childish that you would act this way when no 
one has officially proposed that you be removed from SYNHAK but just from your 
office as treasurer. Seeing as it is quite obvious that you have not been 
performing your duties and specifically targeting those you have a rocky 
relationship with from receiving reimbursement for expenses they've taken on in 
order to improve SYNHAK because it takes too long to obtain the funds upfront 
through the treasurer. That in and of itself is grounds from being removed from 
the position. There are people who would like to apply for membership but feel 
that you, Torrie, would personally target and block their application based on 
personal reasons that have no affect on whether they should be a member or not. 

Also going out and calling Andy B. a mental midget is quite unexcellent and 
something SYNHAK should not tolerate. I also find it unexcellent that that 
email was made public as it was sent under the assumption that it was to remain 
private.

Next comes your specifically naming me, which I find quite ridiculous. Not only 
were you unaware of my personal beliefs for 7/8 months, we have had meals 
together, hung out outside of SYNHAK, and have helped me and Matt out at OSC 
for which we are very thankful for. I find it quite sad that you can't get over 
the fact that some people have different life experiences, beliefs, values, 
thoughts, etc than you do and treat them with respect, as I have treated you. 
Not once has anyone at SYNHAK, to my knowledge, treated you differently or 
horribly based on the fact that you are transgendering, and neither have I. 
Bring up a what I admit was horribly worded as evidence as such is pathetic.

Also in response to the proposal that I posted and was passed by the 
membership, you removed your block of it saying that you wanted to see how it 
would work, under the condition that I would keep track of proposals for a few 
months to monitor the procedures. If you had such serious issues with it, to 
the point where you go on slack and say that you are just going to completely 
ignore them and do-ocracy everything until it becomes a problem is something 
that I have serious issue with. Instead of trying to understand how they work, 
ask me or others questions of issues with the new procedure you just completely 
ignore them. Very unexcellent.

Seeing as this has not been an issue, and is only an issue because you continue 
to make it so I don't see any valid reason to feel unsafe as again no one has 
threatened or treated you differently, and doing so would be unexcellent as 
well.

Should you notify those outside of the issues we've had I think that it would 
be very unfair to the whole situation as you would be showing only one side, 
not to mention they could access the website and get any details they would 
need regarding it, and come to a meeting and ask the membership about it. Plus 
if you are really so tired of the issue then PLEASE stop bringing up the past, 
it has been settled and should no longer be an issue. Seeing as in the past 
we've had drugs left on a ledge in an open truck dock available for anyone 
passing by to see is a serious issue that should be addressed and failing to do 
so does not help SYNHAK as a community. I feel that a drug policy would be a 
plus and have a feeling other organizations would not see it as a negative 
either.

Personally, with the way you've responded in the past and to this I would want 
you removed from the community completely, but would prefer to at least wait 
until the board meeting Monday so that you may have a chance to speak and 
hopefully have these issues resolved so it wouldn't come to that. I do not know 
who you talk to, but last night I talked to at least half of the membership and 
the name that kept popping up as causing an issue at SYNHAK is not mine, nor is 
it Andy, it is you, Torrie. You are either delusional, or just fail to accept 
the obvious that you have been acting in a manner that is not constructive to 
the community and are the root of a lot of problems here at SYNHAK. I agree 
that we can fix it and we are trying to, I just feel that the solution is one 
that you are not going to like, especially if you feel the need to keep calling 
people out and personally attacking them.

I am quite sad that it has come to this, as I considered you a friend but I can 
not any longer. I can certainly get a long with you at the space, and act 
civilly but I have lost a tremendous amount of respect for you and see no way 
of that changing unless you change your attitude.

-Steve



From: [email protected]
To: [email protected]
Date: Wed, 30 Apr 2014 14:29:22 -0400
Subject: Re: [SH-Discuss] Hiatus Hiatus

On Wednesday, April 30, 2014 13:35:52 a l wrote:
> I was only at a portion of the meeting and it was civil and productive
> while I was there, but I'm curious as to what drama you think you have
> caused?
 
And *that* is the response to me explaining why SYNHAK has a toxic environment 
that pushes people away?
 
Not calling out people for being offensive?
 
No suggestion that maybe the reasons I'm upset have validity and should be 
discussed?
 
No desire to figure out who is telling Andy B that my "behavior" is due to 
biochemical processes found in every female on the planet?
 
Your concern is about whether or not I think I'm a source of drama?
 
Right, ok.
 
RIP SYNHAK. Killed by bystander apathy.
 
> 
> Regards,
> Andrew L
> 
> On Apr 30, 2014 12:49 PM, "Torrie Fischer" <[email protected]> wrote:
> > Hey, SYNHAK.
> > 
> > Its only been 8 days but I see that even when I'm not around I somehow
> > cause
> > drama. I think Einstein called that "Spooky Action at a Distance". SYNHAK
> > and
> > I are forever entangled at the quantum level.
> > 
> > My inbox is full of people asking for details about why I went on hiatus.
> > I'm
> > also aware of a board vote to remove me from my office of Treasurer, so I
> > figure that I might as well join the fun and burn some bridges while I go
> > down
> > in beautiful crimson flames. An ex-synhakker (we've got those now!) told
> > me
> > that SYNHAK seems to have a pattern of taking Treasurers and stomping the
> > ever-living crap out of them, so I'm obligated to take this personally.
> > 
> > I'd like to start with this wonderful snippet that was sent to
> > [email protected], which caused me to ragequit:
> > 
> > ----8<----
> > Andrew Buczko <[email protected]>
> > Mar 11
> > to me
> > I'd like to resolve this issue by having Torie (Trevor Fisher) put on
> > suspension from SynHak (this will include SynHak's mailing lists and any
> > other service) for a giving amount of time.
> > 
> > I feel that she needs time to cool off for 3 months, 6 months a year? I'll
> > leave the time period up to the champions. Or at least until her sex
> > change
> > is done (since it has been brought up to me that this "behavior" of her's
> > is due to her taking hormones. ) <-- not mentioned before since it's none
> > of my business.
> > 
> > Hormones or not, the other members and the community should not have to
> > suffer because of her antics.
> > Andy
> > ---->8----
> > 
> > Remember, folks: you voted this mental midget of a person onto the board
> > :)
> > 
> > Lets not forget this other gem from a previous discussion with Steve
> > Radonich
> > concerning my efforts to make SYNHAK a Safe Space:
> > 
> > ----8<----
> > Even if someone was a raging transphobe how would we know? I don't think
> > it
> > really has any bearing on whether they're going to be a member or not as
> > long
> > as they can keep civil and not let their personal feelings or beliefs keep
> > them from getting a long with, at the very least putting up with someone
> > who
> > might be transexual. I highly doubt anyone at SYNHAK would think that is
> > funny
> > and find it offensive that you would even think that.
> > ---->8----
> > 
> > Remember, folks: I'm someone who should be put up with! You all decided to
> > go
> > along with his plan to introduce more rules and bureaucracy to stop
> > someone
> > from forcing the community to address a situation where they feel
> > completely
> > unsafe!
> > 
> > I could also copy in some discussions I've had with folks around the 'net
> > about the rack situation, but frankly I'm just tired of it and would
> > prefer to
> > notify the Akron Community Foundation, our insurance, the city's economic
> > development team, Akron Public Library, and really any of the other
> > organizations in the area that come to me asking about getting involved
> > with
> > details about the corruption in our board brought in by Justin and Devin.
> > I'm
> > sure they would also all love to hear about how the board feels that we've
> > got
> > enough of a drug problem to enact a drug policy.
> > 
> > When we started SYNHAK, we wanted to be better than noisebridge. Judging
> > by
> > the reactions of others when I explain the situation, I think we've
> > succeeded
> > in being a better drama mill than noisebridge:
> > 
> > <jontyw> London is measured in millinoisebridges
> > <evanmcc> that's totally rotten
> > <jontyw> Sounds like you're at at least several noisebridges
> > <evanmcc> "look, you've gotten dangerously close to me having to enage any
> > empathy and for that I am going to punish you forever"
> > 
> > Congrats! I'm so proud of everyone. We are now (in)famous within the
> > hacker
> > communities.
> > 
> > Community, you've got the power to change this and fix things. SYNHAK
> > doesn't
> > have to have this shit. It can really be a nice place where everyone feels
> > safe and there aren't constant power struggles between those who hate
> > rules
> > and those who wish to rule with an iron fist. I was hoping I could step
> > away
> > for a month or two, take a well deserved vacation, and come back to a
> > hackerspace that is not on fire.
> > 
> > Looks like I was totally wrong :)
> > _______________________________________________
> > Discuss mailing list
> > [email protected]
> > https://synhak.org/mailman/listinfo/discuss

_______________________________________________
Discuss mailing list
[email protected]
https://synhak.org/mailman/listinfo/discuss                                     
  
_______________________________________________
Discuss mailing list
[email protected]
https://synhak.org/mailman/listinfo/discuss

Reply via email to