Wait, what did Justin do? All I've seen from him is a willingness to help
and a voice of reason. Is this about the storage racks again? Or was there
something else?
On Apr 30, 2014 6:52 PM, "Steve Radonich IV" <[email protected]> wrote:

> "A community that doesn't treat me like some strange sexual fascination as
> if
>
> my genitals define who I am."
>
> I find the above comment repulsive. I know of no one that is defining you by 
> your genitals except for you constantly bringing it up.
>
> -Steve
>
>
> From: [email protected]
> To: [email protected]
> Date: Wed, 30 Apr 2014 17:09:09 -0400
> Subject: Re: [SH-Discuss] Hiatus Hiatus
>
> On Wednesday, April 30, 2014 16:40:36 Omar Rassi wrote:
> > That email was meant to be sent to members@ as was requested. By those who
> > were present. I asked the room if there was issues with it. No one said
> > anything, it was even suggested to me by another member (not Chris or
> > Torrie) that I add the preface I wrote at the beginning of it. This
> > confused me because we are always talking about how we don't want the dirty
> > laundry out in the open but when steps are taken to handle particular
> > issues without escalation to the public, the champions get intentionally
> > ignored and its viewed as as a backdoor gang up on someone else that
> > suddenly needs transparency. It isn't mine or the champions or Torrie's
> > fault if people don't listen to each other. I've been trying rather
> > unsuccessfully to help people see issues differently and to encourage
> > discussion between individuals. The biggest issue i'm seeing is that people
> > just aren't listening each other, just simply waiting for their turn to
> > speak. These issues won't go away no matter who comes, goes, or gets
> > removed so long as we aren't willing to hear each other and process what is
> > said. This is evidenced by people criticizing lengthy emails, criticizing
> > people who take more time to complete their thoughts in a sentence,
> > ignoring solutions that don't involve punishing people or pointing fingers
> > and outright dismissal of ideas because they don't like the individual
> > presenting it or the premise without presenting a solution of their own
> > going forward. I honestly wanted to make another push along with Andrew L,
> > its still a draft email I'm polishing. But I challenge each of you to look
> > at yourselves in the mirror today and ask yourselves, "what makes me
> > happy?"  And "what could I have done differently for a more excellent
> > outcome?" Don't think about what other people can do differently, remember
> > that you can only control what you do as an individual, so start there.
>
> What makes me happy?
>
> A safe space that I feel comfortable visiting.
>
> A place where I don't feel like I'm going to get my head bitten off for asking
> where to put the vacuum former.
>
> A community that doesn't treat me like some strange sexual fascination as if
> my genitals define who I am.
>
> A group of people who can judge people based on the value of their
> contributions and not the quantity of them or their personal perception of the
> balance of power.
>
> A mailing list where I can write complete thoughts and not be told that I'm
> trying to cause drama or that my mails are too long to consider reading, or
> maybe actually get the issue at hand addressed.
>
>
> What could I have done differently for a more excellent outcome?
>
> Encouraged campaigning among the officer and board candidates to figure out
> what they /really/ want.
>
> Ignored any semblance of transparency, since I got the same result in the end.
>
> Never sponsored Justin.
>
> Never started SYNHAK, the Akron Hackerspace.
>
> >
> > On Apr 30, 2014 3:51 PM, "Steve Radonich IV" <[email protected]> wrote:
> > > I feel that I have to reply to this as I was specifically named.
> > >
> > > One I have to say that if you were truly on hiatus then you would have
> > > delegated your duties to someone else as you would have no dealings with
> > > SYNHAK during the hiatus. I find it quite childish that you would act this
> > > way when no one has officially proposed that you be removed from SYNHAK
> > > but
> > > just from your office as treasurer. Seeing as it is quite obvious that you
> > > have not been performing your duties and specifically targeting those you
> > > have a rocky relationship with from receiving reimbursement for expenses
> > > they've taken on in order to improve SYNHAK because it takes too long to
> > > obtain the funds upfront through the treasurer. That in and of itself is
> > > grounds from being removed from the position. There are people who would
> > > like to apply for membership but feel that you, Torrie, would personally
> > > target and block their application based on personal reasons that have no
> > > affect on whether they should be a member or not.
> > >
> > > Also going out and calling Andy B. a mental midget is quite unexcellent
> > > and something SYNHAK should not tolerate. I also find it unexcellent that
> > > that email was made public as it was sent under the assumption that it was
> > > to remain private.
> > >
> > > Next comes your specifically naming me, which I find quite ridiculous. Not
> > > only were you unaware of my personal beliefs for 7/8 months, we have had
> > > meals together, hung out outside of SYNHAK, and have helped me and Matt
> > > out
> > > at OSC for which we are very thankful for. I find it quite sad that you
> > > can't get over the fact that some people have different life experiences,
> > > beliefs, values, thoughts, etc than you do and treat them with respect, as
> > > I have treated you. Not once has anyone at SYNHAK, to my knowledge,
> > > treated
> > > you differently or horribly based on the fact that you are transgendering,
> > > and neither have I. Bring up a what I admit was horribly worded as
> > > evidence
> > > as such is pathetic.
> > >
> > > Also in response to the proposal that I posted and was passed by the
> > > membership, you removed your block of it saying that you wanted to see how
> > > it would work, under the condition that I would keep track of proposals
> > > for
> > > a few months to monitor the procedures. If you had such serious issues
> > > with
> > > it, to the point where you go on slack and say that you are just going to
> > > completely ignore them and do-ocracy everything until it becomes a problem
> > > is something that I have serious issue with. Instead of trying to
> > > understand how they work, ask me or others questions of issues with the
> > > new
> > > procedure you just completely ignore them. Very unexcellent.
> > >
> > > Seeing as this has not been an issue, and is only an issue because you
> > > continue to make it so I don't see any valid reason to feel unsafe as
> > > again
> > > no one has threatened or treated you differently, and doing so would be
> > > unexcellent as well.
> > >
> > > Should you notify those outside of the issues we've had I think that it
> > > would be very unfair to the whole situation as you would be showing only
> > > one side, not to mention they could access the website and get any details
> > > they would need regarding it, and come to a meeting and ask the membership
> > > about it. Plus if you are really so tired of the issue then PLEASE stop
> > > bringing up the past, it has been settled and should no longer be an
> > > issue.
> > > Seeing as in the past we've had drugs left on a ledge in an open truck
> > > dock
> > > available for anyone passing by to see is a serious issue that should be
> > > addressed and failing to do so does not help SYNHAK as a community. I feel
> > > that a drug policy would be a plus and have a feeling other organizations
> > > would not see it as a negative either.
> > >
> > > Personally, with the way you've responded in the past and to this I would
> > > want you removed from the community completely, but would prefer to at
> > > least wait until the board meeting Monday so that you may have a chance to
> > > speak and hopefully have these issues resolved so it wouldn't come to
> > > that.
> > > I do not know who you talk to, but last night I talked to at least half of
> > > the membership and the name that kept popping up as causing an issue at
> > > SYNHAK is not mine, nor is it Andy, it is you, Torrie. You are either
> > > delusional, or just fail to accept the obvious that you have been acting
> > > in
> > > a manner that is not constructive to the community and are the root of a
> > > lot of problems here at SYNHAK. I agree that we can fix it and we are
> > > trying to, I just feel that the solution is one that you are not going to
> > > like, especially if you feel the need to keep calling people out and
> > > personally attacking them.
> > >
> > > I am quite sad that it has come to this, as I considered you a friend but
> > > I can not any longer. I can certainly get a long with you at the space,
> > > and
> > > act civilly but I have lost a tremendous amount of respect for you and see
> > > no way of that changing unless you change your attitude.
> > >
> > > -Steve
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > > From: [email protected]
> > > To: [email protected]
> > > Date: Wed, 30 Apr 2014 14:29:22 -0400
> > > Subject: Re: [SH-Discuss] Hiatus Hiatus
> > >
> > > On Wednesday, April 30, 2014 13:35:52 a l wrote:
> > > > I was only at a portion of the meeting and it was civil and productive
> > > > while I was there, but I'm curious as to what drama you think you have
> > > > caused?
> > >
> > > And *that* is the response to me explaining why SYNHAK has a toxic
> > > environment that pushes people away?
> > >
> > > Not calling out people for being offensive?
> > >
> > > No suggestion that maybe the reasons I'm upset have validity and should be
> > > discussed?
> > >
> > > No desire to figure out who is telling Andy B that my "behavior" is due to
> > > biochemical processes found in every female on the planet?
> > >
> > > Your concern is about whether or not I think I'm a source of drama?
> > >
> > > Right, ok.
> > >
> > > RIP SYNHAK. Killed by bystander apathy.
> > >
> > > > Regards,
> > > > Andrew L
> > > >
> > > > On Apr 30, 2014 12:49 PM, "Torrie Fischer" <[email protected]>
> wrote:
> > > > > Hey, SYNHAK.
> > > > >
> > > > > Its only been 8 days but I see that even when I'm not around I somehow
> > > > > cause
> > > > > drama. I think Einstein called that "Spooky Action at a Distance".
> > > > > SYNHAK
> > > > > and
> > > > > I are forever entangled at the quantum level.
> > > > >
> > > > > My inbox is full of people asking for details about why I went on
> > > > > hiatus.
> > > > > I'm
> > > > > also aware of a board vote to remove me from my office of Treasurer,
> > > > > so I
> > > > > figure that I might as well join the fun and burn some bridges while I
> > > > > go
> > > > > down
> > > > > in beautiful crimson flames. An ex-synhakker (we've got those now!)
> > > > > told
> > > > > me
> > > > > that SYNHAK seems to have a pattern of taking Treasurers and stomping
> > > > > the
> > > > > ever-living crap out of them, so I'm obligated to take this
> > > > > personally.
> > > > >
> > > > > I'd like to start with this wonderful snippet that was sent to
> > > > > [email protected], which caused me to ragequit:
> > > > >
> > > > > ----8<----
> > > > > Andrew Buczko <[email protected]>
> > > > > Mar 11
> > > > > to me
> > > > > I'd like to resolve this issue by having Torie (Trevor Fisher) put on
> > > > > suspension from SynHak (this will include SynHak's mailing lists and
> > > > > any
> > > > > other service) for a giving amount of time.
> > > > >
> > > > > I feel that she needs time to cool off for 3 months, 6 months a year?
> > > > > I'll
> > > > > leave the time period up to the champions. Or at least until her sex
> > > > > change
> > > > > is done (since it has been brought up to me that this "behavior" of
> > > > > her's
> > > > > is due to her taking hormones. ) <-- not mentioned before since it's
> > > > > none
> > > > > of my business.
> > > > >
> > > > > Hormones or not, the other members and the community should not have
> > > > > to
> > > > > suffer because of her antics.
> > > > > Andy
> > > > > ---->8----
> > > > >
> > > > > Remember, folks: you voted this mental midget of a person onto the
> > > > > board
> > > > >
> > > > > :)
> > > > >
> > > > > Lets not forget this other gem from a previous discussion with Steve
> > > > > Radonich
> > > > > concerning my efforts to make SYNHAK a Safe Space:
> > > > >
> > > > > ----8<----
> > > > > Even if someone was a raging transphobe how would we know? I don't
> > > > > think
> > > > > it
> > > > > really has any bearing on whether they're going to be a member or not
> > > > > as
> > > > > long
> > > > > as they can keep civil and not let their personal feelings or beliefs
> > > > > keep
> > > > > them from getting a long with, at the very least putting up with
> > > > > someone
> > > > > who
> > > > > might be transexual. I highly doubt anyone at SYNHAK would think that
> > > > > is
> > > > > funny
> > > > > and find it offensive that you would even think that.
> > > > > ---->8----
> > > > >
> > > > > Remember, folks: I'm someone who should be put up with! You all
> > > > > decided to
> > > > > go
> > > > > along with his plan to introduce more rules and bureaucracy to stop
> > > > > someone
> > > > > from forcing the community to address a situation where they feel
> > > > > completely
> > > > > unsafe!
> > > > >
> > > > > I could also copy in some discussions I've had with folks around the
> > > > > 'net
> > > > > about the rack situation, but frankly I'm just tired of it and would
> > > > > prefer to
> > > > > notify the Akron Community Foundation, our insurance, the city's
> > > > > economic
> > > > > development team, Akron Public Library, and really any of the other
> > > > > organizations in the area that come to me asking about getting
> > > > > involved
> > > > > with
> > > > > details about the corruption in our board brought in by Justin and
> > > > > Devin.
> > > > > I'm
> > > > > sure they would also all love to hear about how the board feels that
> > > > > we've
> > > > > got
> > > > > enough of a drug problem to enact a drug policy.
> > > > >
> > > > > When we started SYNHAK, we wanted to be better than noisebridge.
> > > > > Judging
> > > > > by
> > > > > the reactions of others when I explain the situation, I think we've
> > > > > succeeded
> > > > > in being a better drama mill than noisebridge:
> > > > >
> > > > > <jontyw> London is measured in millinoisebridges
> > > > > <evanmcc> that's totally rotten
> > > > > <jontyw> Sounds like you're at at least several noisebridges
> > > > > <evanmcc> "look, you've gotten dangerously close to me having to enage
> > > > > any
> > > > > empathy and for that I am going to punish you forever"
> > > > >
> > > > > Congrats! I'm so proud of everyone. We are now (in)famous within the
> > > > > hacker
> > > > > communities.
> > > > >
> > > > > Community, you've got the power to change this and fix things. SYNHAK
> > > > > doesn't
> > > > > have to have this shit. It can really be a nice place where everyone
> > > > > feels
> > > > > safe and there aren't constant power struggles between those who hate
> > > > > rules
> > > > > and those who wish to rule with an iron fist. I was hoping I could
> > > > > step
> > > > > away
> > > > > for a month or two, take a well deserved vacation, and come back to a
> > > > > hackerspace that is not on fire.
> > > > >
> > > > > Looks like I was totally wrong :)
> > > > > _______________________________________________
> > > > > Discuss mailing list
> > > > > [email protected]
> > > > > https://synhak.org/mailman/listinfo/discuss
> > >
> > > _______________________________________________ Discuss mailing list
> > > [email protected] https://synhak.org/mailman/listinfo/discuss
> > >
> > > _______________________________________________
> > > Discuss mailing list
> > > [email protected]
> > > https://synhak.org/mailman/listinfo/discuss
>
>
> _______________________________________________ Discuss mailing list
> [email protected] https://synhak.org/mailman/listinfo/discuss
>
> _______________________________________________
> Discuss mailing list
> [email protected]
> https://synhak.org/mailman/listinfo/discuss
>
_______________________________________________
Discuss mailing list
[email protected]
https://synhak.org/mailman/listinfo/discuss

Reply via email to