On Wednesday, April 30, 2014 20:34:50 a l wrote: > If anything we owe it to -any- of our members to set up the CWG and > determine a course of action surrounding their continued involvement. > > I have a draft of the proposal for a CWG but I have been focusing on school > lately. I will send it out tonight. Omar had also indicated that he has > suggestions for the CWG. > > I did not mean to imply malicious editing. There was a time when we all got > along , even had fun together, and I'm just naive enough to think there's a > chance we can still return to that.
Andrew, I've never stopped believing in that. > > Regards, > Andrew L > > On Apr 30, 2014 8:21 PM, "Robert Rybicki" <[email protected]> wrote: > > Torrie is one of Robert W favorite people in the world. Jen or myself will > > be blocking this by proxy. > > > > Torrie is beyond talented in so many ways and is a huge benefit to the > > community. Granted she is currently using her talents to insult and flame > > others on the mailing list, her unexcellent behavior is a response to > > insults and threatening behavior. You people need to work it out because > > forcing each other out of the community or out of offices is not cutting > > it. That goes for Torrie as well. > > > > Sent from my iPhone > > > > On Apr 30, 2014, at 7:54 PM, Chris Egeland <[email protected]> wrote: > > > > Chiming in that I will block this proposal. That is all. > > > > Chris Egeland > > > > Sent from my iPhone > > > > On Apr 30, 2014, at 19:50, Steve Radonich IV <[email protected]> wrote: > > > > I'm sorry but we do not have time to set up a CWG with all of the > > procedures and such they are supposed to follow while this type of > > treatment is going on. These are all publicly available on the email list > > and the quotes are in no way altered. I really am failing to see your > > logic > > in defending Torrie's actions today on the discuss list when she has been > > nothing but vile towards others. > > > > -Steve > > > > ------------------------------ > > Date: Wed, 30 Apr 2014 19:45:41 -0400 > > From: [email protected] > > To: [email protected] > > Subject: Re: [SH-Discuss] Proposal: Removal of Torrie from the SYNHAK > > Community > > > > I'm not sure we have enough facts to back up the claims made in some of > > these quotes. > > Until such time that we get the community working group involved and have > > all the facts rather than partial quotes and hurt feelings I cannot > > support > > this proposal. > > Regards, > > Andrew L > > On Apr 30, 2014 7:26 PM, "Steve Radonich IV" <[email protected]> wrote: > > > > Proposal: Removal Torrie from the SYNHAK Community > > > > I am proposing the following: > > > > The removal of Torrie Fischer from the SYNHAK community for the following > > reasons. > > > > * Negatively talking about SYNHAK affecting the public opinion of the > > > > community on the mailing lists, examples being: > > * "Never started SYNHAK, the Akron Hackerspace." - Wed, April 30 2014 > > > > 17:09 > > > > * "Then I hear that I'm being removed as Treasurer due to Devin and > > > > Andy's persecution complex, so I started looking for housing in the > > > > San Francisco because SYNHAK is dead to me." - Wed, April 30 2014 > > 15:59 > > > > * "It died months ago when I was convinced to rescind my proposal to > > > > remove Justin from the board." - Wed, April 30 2014 15:59 > > > > * "Congrats! I'm so proud of everyone. We are now (in)famous within > > > > the hacker communities." - Wed, April 30 2014 12:49 > > > > * "RIP SYNHAK. Killed by bystander apathy." - Wed, April 30 2014 14:29 > > > > * Publicly attacking Steve Radonich IV and Andy B. on the mailing list by > > > > unjustly calling them names, examples being: > > * "Remember, folks: you voted this mental midget of a person onto the > > > > board :)" - Wed, April 30 2014 12:49 - Directed towards Andy > > > > * "Remember, folks: I'm someone who should be put up with! You all > > > > decided to go along with his plan to introduce more rules and bureaucracy > > to stop someone from forcing the community to address a situation where > > they feel completely unsafe!" - Wed, April 30 2014 12:49 - Directed > > towards > > Steve > > > > * "A community that doesn't treat me like some strange sexual > > > > fascination as if my genitals define who I am." - Wed, April 30 2014 17:09 > > - Directed towards Steve > > > > * "Steve loves rules and has an authoritarian stance on everything. > > > > Thats the only reasonable answer that can explain this majestic piece of > > legalese:" - Wed, April 30 2014 16:12 - Directed towards Steve > > > > * Using her position of Treasurer to target those she has a > > > > disagreement with: > > * "Devin - It will be reimbursed just not now, but me and Andy have > > > > been told no on reimbursements and just only us. Given reciepts to others > > to get the money. Someone took something the wrong way, and they are > > attacking back using the position as treasurer. But this needs to stop > > right now, because it is discriminatory." - Tue, April 29 2014 - Meeting > > Minutes > > > > It is with these issues, and others that I may not even be aware of, that > > I feel Torrie Fischer is no longer someone SYNHAK can afford to have > > around. Causing division and strife within the community, then refusing to > > take responsibility for it. She has shown that she can't be trusted in a > > position of power within SYNHAK as she uses it as a weapon on her personal > > enemies. Personally attacking members, calling them transphobes when there > > is no evidence of such, talking negatively about SYNHAK, and saying that > > SYNHAK is dead are all reasons for removal. Plus if she thinks it's dead > > then there is no reason for her to be here any ways as it will just cause > > trouble. > > > > -Steve > > > > _______________________________________________ > > Discuss mailing list > > [email protected] > > https://synhak.org/mailman/listinfo/discuss > > > > > > _______________________________________________ Discuss mailing list > > [email protected] https://synhak.org/mailman/listinfo/discuss > > > > _______________________________________________ > > Discuss mailing list > > [email protected] > > https://synhak.org/mailman/listinfo/discuss > > > > _______________________________________________ > > Discuss mailing list > > [email protected] > > https://synhak.org/mailman/listinfo/discuss > > > > > > _______________________________________________ > > Discuss mailing list > > [email protected] > > https://synhak.org/mailman/listinfo/discuss
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part.
_______________________________________________ Discuss mailing list [email protected] https://synhak.org/mailman/listinfo/discuss
