IMO we don't need to set a time max. Under our current operation. When someone has felt the discussion has gone long enough they can create a motion to vote or motion to table the discussion. With a 2nd person 2nd the motion a vote occurs. The moderator's job is to keep discussion on point and for those who want to speak the opportunity to speak.
Justin On Mon, Jun 16, 2014 at 7:19 AM, Michael Griesacker <[email protected]> wrote: > PM: -I thought we did a way with "blocking" and consensus with your > "straight voting" proposal? > > ---------- Forwarded message ---------- > From: alex kot <[email protected]> > Date: Mon, Jun 16, 2014 at 5:40 AM > Subject: [SH-Discuss] Proposal: Time Limit proposals during meetings > To: SYN/HAK discussion list <[email protected]> > > > Problem: Meetings get drawn out too long when proposals are brought up. > > > Solution: Mandatorily when a proposal is brought up during the meeting it > can be only discussed for 10 minutes max. The person who created the > proposal will become the moderator at that time; to insure that time is > justified for the discussion. > > > Other: > > Current proposals rules > > - Proposals are discussed for one meeting, and decided upon at the > meeting that immediately follows. > - Proposals may be brought up at any time, but must be discussed for > at least one week before any decision is made. > - During that week, discussion must happen during a regular weekly > meeting. > - Proposals are decided upon at the first meeting that immediately > follows that one week discussion period. > - You need to be at the deciding meeting to block consensus or > otherwise contribute to the decision. > > > _______________________________________________ > Discuss mailing list > [email protected] > https://synhak.org/mailman/listinfo/discuss > >
_______________________________________________ Discuss mailing list [email protected] https://synhak.org/mailman/listinfo/discuss
