As is usual, what is missing from this conversation is ... money.
 
Geeks get emotionally attached to their technologies.  The like this, they
love that.  This is "cool".  To some it borders on religion - "Open source
or death!".
 
But what is important is the money.  Business owners, non-profits, whatever,
hire us to build a tool to fix a problem.  We should choose the technologies
to build that tool that will provide the business owner with the lowest cost
of ownership.  In most cases everything else is secondary.
 
I cannot think of any compelling reason to use PHP except that the company's
IT team uses it and already know it.  Even then, it would likely be cost
effective over the long run to switch to CF.
 
asp.net does have some compelling features and it is the only real competing
technology to CF in my opinion.  
 
RoR has compelling features - but hasn't gained enough traction that I would
recommend it as an enterprise level solution to any decent sized client.
 
PHP is for amateurs and .net costs more to develop in.  Java is ridicules to
develop in from a cost perspective.  Why use Java when you have a high level
abstraction called ColdFusion that saves vast amounts of work and
homogenizes the code base?
 
Bottom line - you can build and maintain web apps for less money using
ColdFusion.  Period.  CF is the clear choice.
 
Now - Adobe needs to get their marketing act together.  The have the best
technology.  CF needs resources put into development (time to get rid of the
stupid bugs) and they really need to focus on the top 1,000 companies in the
US.  Unless, they have decided that they are just going to abandon CF if it
doesn't grow organically?  Personally, I think they should hire a small
sales force to direct market to key (large) accounts.  Too many CIO's have
no idea of the benefits of CF, or worse, think it is a dying technology.
 
Shane Heasley

  _____  

From: ad...@acfug.org [mailto:ad...@acfug.org] On Behalf Of Derrick Peavy
Sent: Friday, July 09, 2010 10:49 AM
To: discussion@acfug.org
Subject: [ACFUG Discuss] I find myself where I have tried to avoid going. A
short rant and then a question. Would love some feedback.


I know this is kind of long and winding, but I'd love some feedback.

------------

Starting a project.  

And, as I've discussed my coding abilities with people I meet they are
continuously giving me looks of bewildering and beguiling amusement. Not
talking about any Dick and Jane. I'm talking about folks from the ATDC,
other entrepreneurs, coders. 

Whenever I say that I use CF, they act like someone just stepped out from
the stone age.  And, I don't care - that's their problem. I make money from
my skills and can handle 500k page views a day without breaking a sweat in
my applications and sleep well knowing I have no errors.  But, their lack of
understanding that CF even still exists baffles me. It seems that people
believe that the only web language that exists now is PHP and possibly, Ruby
(ergo, PHP).  (Hey, Bank of America is running CF. Maybe that's not a
selling point?)

But on this new project, the folks say we need to do it in PHP so that it
can be sold off if the project works. Ok. Fine, I get that - I really,
really do and I'm actually in favor of it because I don't want a pissing
contest at that future point.  But I'm not coding it in PHP. No such
fracking way. I'll help, offer guidance on DB design, help you translate CF
code to PHP if you want. Whatever.

And yet, these people keep saying, "Hey, it's easier for you to learn PHP if
you know CF, than for me to learn CF as a PHP developer." That makes no
sense to me.

On one code example (in PHP), the database connection was established on
line 13 in the file  >>>>  $con = mysql_connect(db/id/pw)   >>>> and then
the connection was not closed until line 92 >>>>   mysql_close($con);
>>>>>> 

Within those 80 lines of code, they did 2 http calls to external web
services, created two arrays, threw in 40 lines of comments and then
somewhere in the bottom, finally made a SQL statement. 

WT-Flying-Frack????


Is this what people accept? Granted, this was by someone who admittedly
said, they were a horrible developer - but then in the same breath asked me
why this would be a problem and I kind of stood there looking like I'd been
hit by a bat.

I've never been shy about not being a university trained developer. But I've
worked with database design since 1993, and with CF for over 12 years. So,
hey, cut me some slack.  I know I can't give you the lingo about why an 80
line database connection is bad in pure technical terms, but I damn well
know that the faster, cleaner, shorter you make your database calls, the
better off you are for so many reasons. 

So, here's the question(s). 

How do you explain to someone the basic core ideas behind CF and PHP. PHP is
an Apache module. CF runs on a java servlet or on Jrun, Tomcat, etc. I'm
honestly not the best to explain it.  But I've seen the performance side,
and it's good. And I've seen the code bloat in PHP files and it's bad. Yeah,
I know anyone in any language can write bad code. But damn if PHP doesn't
seem to be full of it. 

An ATDC person asked me if CF was an interpreted language. I said yes. And
then he acted as if the argument was done because so is PHP.  And so, that
means what?... Therefore the two are the same and equal? Ergo, you go open
source because everything thinks thats best? Bad argument. 

How do you explain to someone the technical idea behind something like CF? 

How do you explain that even in writing a PHP page that no one but you will
ever use, that you don't do an 80 line open database connection call unless
it's 80 lines of SQL and then, that's a whole other issue?


_____________________
Derrick Peavy
derr...@derrickpeavy.com
404-786-5036


"Innovation distinguishes between a leader and a follower." -Steve Jobs
________________________








-------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe from this list, manage your profile @ 
http://www.acfug.org?fa=login.edituserform

For more info, see http://www.acfug.org/mailinglists
Archive @ http://www.mail-archive.com/discussion%40acfug.org/
List hosted by http://www.fusionlink.com
-------------------------------------------------------------

Reply via email to