-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA1
Le 20/09/2014 12:01, stephane de Labrusse a écrit : > > > Indeed we have to write and update a 'new roadmap' for the SME Server, > I will try to have a look on this, but even if anything start by an > idea, we need coders or people really involved for doing it. You could > easily understand it is not because you need it for your job, That we > will do it for your beautiful eyes. Please come here and become > volunteers :) Yes, setting a roadmap would be good, but, with the sparse resources we currently have, we shouldn't add any ETA ;-) > > -Horde > > I would see SME Server with your contrib to become a core part of sme. > We started with horde, for what I tested, it is useful, thanks for > your works. I agree that our current horde is far too old. We should either replace it with a more current one, or drop it completely from the core. I personnaly am more in favor of moving it out of the core (but keep it as a maintained contribs), but, this is just my personal POV (and because I use SOGo anyway) > > -Samba4 > > For the next release we will have to use it. It is really not my > circle of competencies, other may answer better than me, mainly if we > want to have an Active directory compatibility. I have the feeling > that it is wanted, asked, but no works really started. Please go If > you want this. I frankly don't see what samba4 would buy us. It seems a huge job for very small advantages Plus side: - - workstation auth a bit more secure as we'd switch to a kerb based stuff - - MS tools to manage workstation (not even sure this is a plus ;-)) Cons: - - huge integration job - - we must ditch all our currently working stuff and replace them with the one supported by samba (mainly DNS and LDAP) - - all our currently working apps using LDAP would break, as switching to samba 4 will force the AD style LDAP scheme Maybe I'm misinformed on this topic, so please, correct me if I'm wrong, but I personally don't think it worth it > > > -Centos7/SME10 > > I'm not kidding, huge challenge, at minimum all services must be > rewritten for using systemd. Starting to work on C7 would be a far better investment IMHO. it'll be hard, probably a lot more work than the C5 -> C6 switch (as Stephane noted, a big part of the job will be because of the switch to systemd, but there's also tons of advantages. I especially can't wait to have every service logged through Journald) Modernizing the server-manager should also be high priority, and this will need a lot of work. First, we'd need web designers to create a more attractive look'n'feel, and perl coders to rewrite all the panels with a more modern framework (probably Mojolicious, as proposed by Charlie, and I agree it's an excellent framework) Cheers - -- Daniel Berteaud FIREWALL-SERVICES SARL. Société de Services en Logiciels Libres Technopôle Montesquieu 33650 MARTILLAC Tel : 05 56 64 15 32 Fax : 05 56 64 15 32 Visio: https://vroom.im/dani Web : http://www.firewall-services.com -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1 iQIcBAEBAgAGBQJUHWNXAAoJECBbcTcE6GwMTSgP+weWffmIw8pG4ajn4wU/OtwJ soT/cVNsw90ETEXetbrlcbuWVprNwPDwc2yS9d3IlOqKy85JmWSxVzC0oGhu/GTs pmVOrbOCT4BbACZKZWWRacZQu/U5iSx9G44ae0EJxWqS8nfQm0PX0UHrxWyxL2uP z6iYrHqjvTI+4L+oFRlNf44FrPotlKjm1nmRjkovPf48NJa22f8lBQO0/lj9jMhl kqaB6idaGtAHcta3guUEqyi1Bw7qpBxezn2Q/mIST8yF/J6ufMltMNpxGpS+0eQh ncyl2ofWp2ABGsSJymNRqfrEDf8pgUWXvb59OK9MN/3lqv1vx8DmVVCLE7L4ml03 UtNTW5pcQ9mYPa9mP29j9NNcUKqxaBK9cNM7pVaEcmjwYmywqBSrCV8zkVkUrJFH B/1hE0COzBl0F6Bpiccc8kgJjB8A23b5mKp48ofpGGX62W2eFFvgS8qDfyvrZKlO DR7R35Q+HGTAjHgCquCL/iNkT4fK8NSKSiJqWs1dIPysRR7nSOULqdPd2KBdlMYJ CiHI0kDPEVMs11lrWEUUWWmNZKA0Ip7DwGX8ELyH/ly0ZqMq/eJ+/gk5hRYjfxXi 5ZhQtVlOWFgPe2Q/br2wRcFzZ3mnvsq51cPXhRSi+U+AoHuivmoCwcRFZ2E7lbXM oGg9TBTIRPHBW5zEheNN =l7NJ -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- _______________________________________________ Discussion about project organisation and overall direction To unsubscribe, e-mail [email protected] Searchable archive at http://lists.contribs.org/mailman/public/discussion/
