* Daniel Pocock <dan...@pocock.pro> [2019-10-14 20:57]: > When I wrote re-think the whole platform, I meant either finding a > de-centralized way to distribute control of list membership or an > alternative technology. I wasn't just thinking about everybody > endlessly moving from one list server to the next.
That should be so, if mailing list is set up for discussion of certain subject and anything related to that subject, an ethical administrator shall allow people to communicate. That is expected from a mailing list. For example GNU project is not political, and Guix people are making it political for their agenda, but not allowing people to speak to Guix people about the same issue they have started talking inside of Guix space. That is censorship, not just moderation of off-topic communication. But setting up such system in place would be something similar to Bitcoin block chain that makes sure that certain emails are always there INSIDE of the block chain, but some are on topic and visible and some are off-topic and not visible. Verification of the block chain could make sure that everybody knows who wrote what to the mailing list even if some emails were marked as off-topic. Something like that. Jean _______________________________________________ Discussion mailing list Discussion@lists.fsfellowship.eu https://lists.fsfellowship.eu/mailman/listinfo/discussion
