On 14/10/2019 14:49, [email protected] wrote: > Oct 14, 2019, 13:42 by [email protected]: > >> > we are protected from censorship. No, you're not. Do you really believe I wouldn't consider censoring this list if somebody from Google arrived on my doorstep right now and handed me $300,000 to do so? If you want protection from censorship then it is necessary to re-think the whole platform, not just move to another list. Regards, Daniel _______________________________________________ Discussion mailing list [email protected] https://lists.fsfellowship.eu/mailman/listinfo/discussion
- RMS resigned, why not Matthias Kirschner too? Daniel Pocock
- Re: RMS resigned, why not Matthias Kirschner too... aristocat
- Re: RMS resigned, why not Matthias Kirschner... Daniel Pocock
- Re: RMS resigned, why not Matthias Kirschner too... garfield
- Re: RMS resigned, why not Matthias Kirschner too... Dr. Michael Stehmann
- Re: RMS resigned, why not Matthias Kirschner... ahilter
- Re: RMS resigned, why not Matthias Kirsc... Dr. Michael Stehmann
- [no subject] Stefan Frech
- Re: ahilter
- Re: Daniel Pocock
- Re: Re: ahilter
- Re: Jean Louis
- censorship alternatives... Daniel Pocock
- Re: censorship alternat... Jean Louis
- Re: censorship alternat... Daniel Pocock
- Re: censorship alternat... Jean Louis
- Re: censorship alternat... bruno
- Re: censorship alternat... bruno
- Re: censorship alternat... MBR
- Re: censorship alternat... Daniel Pocock
