update_file.sh /usr/local/www/wizards/traffic_shaper_wizard.xml

Rerun the traffic shaper, pick Asterisk, set the bandwidth to 1.5 megabit.

Then that is added.

Scott


On 9/24/05, Mojo Jojo <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Thanks but what about this part :)
>
> > 1- Is there any reasonably easy way for me to add the IAX (5036) and IAX2
> > (4569) ports to the prioritization after I run the wizard?
>
>
> ----- Original Message -----
> From: "Bill Marquette" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> To: <[email protected]>
> Sent: Saturday, September 24, 2005 6:14 PM
> Subject: Re: [pfSense-discussion] Traffic Shaper
>
>
> On 9/24/05, Mojo Jojo <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > > Also, I assume the wizard only prioritizes the SIP port? Does it
> > > prioritize
> > > any other ports like the IAX ports, RTP and so on?
> > >>
> > >>The asterisk setting prioritizes
> > >>UDP 5060-5069
> > >>and
> > >>UDP 10000-17226 (no idea why - SIP maybe?)
> >
> > This may help:
> > http://www.voip-info.org/tiki-index.php?page=Asterisk%20firewall%20rules
> >
> > UDP 10000-17226 is for SIP RTP, I have no idea what RTP is but is has to
> > do
> > with the fact that SIP and "Non SIP Aware Firewalls" do not get along very
> > well. Basically things happen with SIP where you can never guess which of
> > the ports within this range it will use at any one time, so... The only
> > choice if you need SIP is to leave the whole range open, stinks but it's
> > the
> > only solution from what I understand.
> >
> > I have hear some buzz about "SIP aware" firewalls which deal with SIP in
> > some other way.
> >
> > Anyhow, from what I understand it's not 10000-17226 that it uses, it's
> > 10000-20000 but I could be wrong.
> >
> > Questions:
> >
> > 1- Is there any reasonably easy way for me to add the IAX (5036) and IAX2
> > (4569) ports to the prioritization after I run the wizard?
> >
> > 2- Can you possibly ad these ports to the wizard so they will just work
> > when
> > you select the Asterisk option?
>
> Committed.  It'll be in the next release (after 0.85.2 which just released)
>
>

Reply via email to