On Thu, Aug 17, 2006, E L wrote about "Re: DMCA �??�½??�??�½??�??�½?�¨�??�½?�¥ - �??�½?�¢�??�½??�??�½?�¨�??�½?? �??�½??�??�½?�¦???????�¨": > I don't see your point, > What are you trying to prove? That it's not a perfect suggestion? well it's > not. > What other options do you have? You rather ISP hunting the internet for > copyright infrigments?
My only suggestion is: go back to the status quo of 199 (or better yet, 1978, before the copyright extension in the US). There's simply no need to change the laws. This is my view. People who continue to copy copyrighted files illegally will continue to be offenders. Those who want to follow the law will need to use legal alternatives - buying CDs, using Apple's ipod service or new ones that will appear, listen to radio (on FM, cable or the Internet), and so on. > So my question is simple, between the this and the other model which is now > pushed in USA and latly in europe as well > what do you prefer? > Cause when things come to shove that the two options you got. I have a slight preference to your model, but I ultimately prefer the status quo, not either of these alternatives (one "nevela", the other "trefa"). -- Nadav Har'El | Thursday, Aug 17 2006, 24 Av 5766 [EMAIL PROTECTED] |----------------------------------------- Phone +972-523-790466, ICQ 13349191 |A professor is one who talks in someone http://nadav.harel.org.il |else's sleep. --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
