On Thu, Oct 13, 2016 at 5:53 AM, Robin Becker <ro...@reportlab.com> wrote:
> On 12/10/2016 22:09, Nathaniel Smith wrote:
>>
>> On Wed, Oct 12, 2016 at 7:05 AM, Robin Becker <ro...@reportlab.com> wrote:
>>>
>>> Any manylinux experts here?
>>>
> .......
>>
>>     https://bugs.python.org/issue28092#msg276164
>>
>> I suspect that this will get reverted again before 3.6-final given
>> that it does in fact cause problems...
>
>
> I prodded that issue with>
>
>
>
>>> Don't want to add too much noise, but this issue also affects the
>>> manylinux project build compiler (gcc 4.8.2).
>
>
>> STINNER Victor added the comment:
>>
>>
>> Would it be possible to upgrade the "manylinux" compiler (take a more
>> recent GCC version)?
>
>
> I'm not the expert here, but I though the whole point was to have a common
> denominator system. Is gcc part of the 'commons' or can we use any version
> of the compiler provided the other common denominator libs are acceptable to
> it?

Replied there: https://bugs.python.org/issue28092#msg278584

-- 
Nathaniel J. Smith -- https://vorpus.org
_______________________________________________
Distutils-SIG maillist  -  Distutils-SIG@python.org
https://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/distutils-sig

Reply via email to