On Sep 10, 8:00 pm, Steve Holden <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > I don't see why Django can't be just as much a part of the Python > community as, say, Zope, who frequently distribute code through PyPi. I > don't see the advantage of fragmenting the infrastructure. That's what > it's there for - supporting Python users.
Right, be it the CheeseShop then if we have the blessing of Steve Holden. Integration-wise, Django is more like Zope (apps are coupled to the framework) than TurboGears (apps are loosely coupled), so namespace packages may make sense. A namespace should be agreed upon anyhow (i.e. even if namespace packages will not be used) though. And packaging guidelines are direly needed. And what's with Django itself? Now that 1.0 is out it's high time for `easy_install django` to work (James?). --~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~ You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Django developers" group. To post to this group, send email to django-developers@googlegroups.com To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/django-developers?hl=en -~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---