Am 10.09.2008 um 18:20 schrieb mrts:
> If setuptools remains the recommended way of packaging apps (I don't > necessarily oppose this, but I'd like to hear other opinions; what I > don't like is littering CheeseShop with stuff that is unusable in > general Python context), at least a fixed policy is needed: > * designate a global namespace where all apps should live (e.g. > django.apps.mycompany.fooapp or just django.apps.fooapp) > * find a way for avoiding name collisions there (mycompany would deal > with that) > * document all the above and the steps and requirements for creating > and publishing a reusable app. Although this is a shameless plug, I'd like to point to a small helper app that is able to find resuable Django apps that are packaged as egg files. It's independent from the PYTHONPATH and hooks into the INSTALLED_APPS setting to automatically find every Django app that has a so called entry point, a pretty nice feature of setuptools to find components/plugins/pluggables [1]. It also works well with virtualenv. For more information head over to http://code.google.com/p/django-reusableapps/ and start making eggs. Cheers, Jannis 1: http://peak.telecommunity.com/DevCenter/setuptools#dynamic-discovery-of-services-and-plugins --~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~ You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Django developers" group. To post to this group, send email to django-developers@googlegroups.com To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/django-developers?hl=en -~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---
