I think I may have to actually agree that multi-threading is somewhat needed, since it does limit these kind of features from working. I, however, would deem it less a priority than most thing. If you can write a patch for it (or if one exists, I didn't look) though, I don't see any reason to not extend runserver to use it.
On Nov 16, 6:45 am, Steve Holden <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Julian wrote: > > [...] I think some people want to use snippets like that [...] > > Wouldn't you agree that's a pretty feeble use case for something as > potentially disruptive as multi-threaded serving? Particularly when the > CherryPy alternative is so readily available. > > regards > Steve > -- > Steve Holden +1 571 484 6266 +1 800 494 3119 > Holden Web LLC http://www.holdenweb.com/ --~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~ You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Django developers" group. To post to this group, send email to django-developers@googlegroups.com To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/django-developers?hl=en -~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---
