On Tue, Feb 9, 2010 at 7:19 AM, Karen Tracey <kmtra...@gmail.com> wrote: > On Mon, Feb 8, 2010 at 8:44 AM, Luke Plant <l.plant...@cantab.net> wrote: >> >> What do people think? > > Ugh. Assuming no one can come up with a brilliant fix so that the auto_adapt > stuff can work when combined with arbitrary other decorators (I can't), I > favor switching to a system that requires different decorators for methods > vs. functions and documenting the backwards-incompatibility for 1.2. What > you propose there reads pretty well to me.
I concur. Ugh. :-) It's not nice but given the alternatives, I think the backwards incompatibility is the best option. +1 to introducing method_dec (bikeshedding - I actually prefer method_decorator), removing @auto_adapt_to_method, and documenting the problem with user_passes_test. Russ %-) -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Django developers" group. To post to this group, send email to django-develop...@googlegroups.com. To unsubscribe from this group, send email to django-developers+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com. For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/django-developers?hl=en.
