> > So, the benchmarks are interesting. They tell us which stacks are > fully featured, and which stacks are very lightweight. Apart from > that, they don't tell us much at all - is Django's template engine > slow, or is it about right for the work it does? This benchmark > doesn't tell us that, it only says it is slower than a bare bones > template engine, which is unsurprising, and shouldn't be a cause for > concern. > It is sort of no sense. Django is fully featured and we do not care... some other are fast because they are lightweight... tell me which 'full featured' feature prevents it from become better. I guess for the #1 framework it is important to be leader... hmm... not sure what you mean by 'right for the work it does'... who needs a template that doesn't do what you need?
-- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Django developers" group. To view this discussion on the web visit https://groups.google.com/d/msg/django-developers/-/YAcwku7WouYJ. To post to this group, send email to django-developers@googlegroups.com. To unsubscribe from this group, send email to django-developers+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com. For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/django-developers?hl=en.
