#30179: Merging 3 or more media objects can throw unnecessary
MediaOrderConflictWarnings
-------------------------------+------------------------------------
Reporter: Matt Westcott | Owner: nobody
Type: Bug | Status: new
Component: Forms | Version: master
Severity: Normal | Resolution:
Keywords: | Triage Stage: Accepted
Has patch: 0 | Needs documentation: 0
Needs tests: 0 | Patch needs improvement: 0
Easy pickings: 0 | UI/UX: 0
-------------------------------+------------------------------------
Comment (by Matt Westcott):
@Matthias: I //think// that solution will work, but only if:
1) we're going to insist that users always use this notation wherever a
"non-dependency" exists - i.e. it is considered user error for the user to
forget to put color-picker.js in its own sub-list
2) we have a very tight definition of what a dependency is - e.g. color-
picker.js can't legally be a dependency of text-editor.js / text-editor-
extras.js, because it exists on its own in ColorPicker's media - which
also invalidates the [jquery, widget1, noconflict] + [jquery, widget2,
noconflict] case (does noconflict depend on widget1 or not?)
I suspect you only have to go slightly before the complexity of [jquery,
widget1, noconflict] + [jquery, widget2, noconflict] before you start
running into counter-examples again.
--
Ticket URL: <https://code.djangoproject.com/ticket/30179#comment:13>
Django <https://code.djangoproject.com/>
The Web framework for perfectionists with deadlines.
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
"Django updates" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email
to [email protected].
To post to this group, send email to [email protected].
To view this discussion on the web visit
https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/django-updates/064.7adc8e49b956c22adc946d4430a1bbdd%40djangoproject.com.
For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.