On Mon, 3 Nov 2008, Erik Lotspeich wrote: > I'll give an example. Presumably, the mbox "sent" mail file contains the > message sent to the MTA. That looks similar to this: > > To: [EMAIL PROTECTED], [EMAIL PROTECTED], > [EMAIL PROTECTED], > [EMAIL PROTECTED], [EMAIL PROTECTED] > > The received message (in which verification failed) is folded differently: > > To: [EMAIL PROTECTED], [EMAIL PROTECTED], [EMAIL PROTECTED], > [EMAIL PROTECTED], [EMAIL PROTECTED] > > I haven't investigated further, but I presume that the MTA (sendmail, in > this case) is making a change to "clean up" the folding from the MUA > (Thunderbird).
That's possible. Try it using command-line message injection to see if the To: header you feed it and the one you receive are the same. > Is it possible for verification to fail due to the change in folding? Yes, with "simple" header canonicalization. Change it to "relaxed" and this shouldn't be an issue. ------------------------------------------------------------------------- This SF.Net email is sponsored by the Moblin Your Move Developer's challenge Build the coolest Linux based applications with Moblin SDK & win great prizes Grand prize is a trip for two to an Open Source event anywhere in the world http://moblin-contest.org/redirect.php?banner_id=100&url=/ _______________________________________________ dkim-milter-discuss mailing list [email protected] https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/dkim-milter-discuss
