On Thu, 6 Nov 2008, Murray S. Kucherawy wrote: > On Mon, 3 Nov 2008, Erik Lotspeich wrote: >> I'll give an example. Presumably, the mbox "sent" mail file contains the >> message sent to the MTA. That looks similar to this: >> >> To: [EMAIL PROTECTED], [EMAIL PROTECTED], >> [EMAIL PROTECTED], >> [EMAIL PROTECTED], [EMAIL PROTECTED] >> >> The received message (in which verification failed) is folded differently: >> >> To: [EMAIL PROTECTED], [EMAIL PROTECTED], [EMAIL PROTECTED], >> [EMAIL PROTECTED], [EMAIL PROTECTED] > > As mentioned, the sendmail MTA does rewrite some headers in order to get > them to fold nicely. This code is old, added back when such reformatting > for aesthetic reasons didn't break anything and was in fact desirable for > presentation reasons. Obviously it has ill effects now, but this wasn't > anticipated back then.
The question is, then -- is it still necessary? I don't know what your interaction with the full-on sendmail product is, but can it come out since it's only complicating things moving forward? Or would there be fear that it would only break things further if that were done? This doesnt' feel like this should need to be fixed in the dkim-milter when it's the fault of the MTA. -Dan -- "GO HOME AND COOK!!!" Donielle Cocossa, Taco Bell, 2:30 AM --------Dan Mahoney-------- Techie, Sysadmin, WebGeek Gushi on efnet/undernet IRC ICQ: 13735144 AIM: LarpGM Site: http://www.gushi.org --------------------------- ------------------------------------------------------------------------- This SF.Net email is sponsored by the Moblin Your Move Developer's challenge Build the coolest Linux based applications with Moblin SDK & win great prizes Grand prize is a trip for two to an Open Source event anywhere in the world http://moblin-contest.org/redirect.php?banner_id=100&url=/ _______________________________________________ dkim-milter-discuss mailing list [email protected] https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/dkim-milter-discuss
