Ah seems to be forensic. Any way of specifying in a dmarc record that I don't want them? On Aug 10, 2012 1:23 PM, "Franck Martin" <[email protected]> wrote:
> I remember junping increase the rate of send for some domains re > Interop. He may have left it… Also you are sure these are not forensic > reports? These are sent as soon as an email is rejected. > > We have warned people not to enable forensic reports until they know > exactly how many emails they are likely to receive (deduced from the > aggregate reports) > > From: "<Menotti Minutillo>", "Jr." <[email protected]> > Date: Friday, August 10, 2012 10:05 AM > To: Benjamin Billon <[email protected]> > Cc: "[email protected]" <[email protected]> > Subject: Re: [dmarc-discuss] Aggregate report spam > > Ah turns out i mistyped - it is yeah.net, but the other 2 are .com > > On Fri, Aug 10, 2012 at 12:01 PM, Menotti Minutillo, Jr. < > [email protected]> wrote: > >> Let me check if they are net or com... I'll report back. >> On Aug 10, 2012 11:55 AM, "Benjamin Billon" <[email protected]> wrote: >> >>> That's Netease's domains, the biggest ISP in China >>> >>> Junping is on the list, you should talk to him directly! >>> >>> -- >>> Benjamin >>> >>> Le 10/08/2012 17:43, Menotti Minutillo, Jr. a écrit : >>> >>> Yeah.net >>> 163.net >>> 126.net >>> >>> >>> >>> _______________________________________________ >>> dmarc-discuss mailing list >>> [email protected] >>> http://www.dmarc.org/mailman/listinfo/dmarc-discuss >>> >>> NOTE: Participating in this list means you agree to the DMARC Note Well >>> terms (http://www.dmarc.org/note_well.html) >>> >>> > > > -- > Menotti Minutillo >
_______________________________________________ dmarc-discuss mailing list [email protected] http://www.dmarc.org/mailman/listinfo/dmarc-discuss NOTE: Participating in this list means you agree to the DMARC Note Well terms (http://www.dmarc.org/note_well.html)
