I dont think I actually got the ruf recommendation from core DMARC spec docs or the core DMARC site. If I would've looked at, say, the Gmail recommendations, I definitely would've ignored it.
I think any references to ruf in FAQs should have a quick warning, e.g. "Note that specifying an ruf tag will ask receiving ISPs to report authentication failures to the address specified in your domain's ruf tag as they happen. This often causes an influx of reports and should only be enabled if you've prepared some aggregation function." On Fri, Aug 10, 2012 at 2:33 PM, Authonaut <[email protected]> wrote: > On 8/10/12 2:06 PM, Menotti Minutillo, Jr. wrote: > >> Thanks again for all the help everyone. It wasn't too clear that the ruf >> would cause that overwhelming amount of reports. A simple enough fix :) >> > Suggested text on how to make this point clear is more than welcome! > > =- Tim > > > ______________________________**_________________ > dmarc-discuss mailing list > [email protected] > http://www.dmarc.org/mailman/**listinfo/dmarc-discuss<http://www.dmarc.org/mailman/listinfo/dmarc-discuss> > > NOTE: Participating in this list means you agree to the DMARC Note Well > terms > (http://www.dmarc.org/note_**well.html<http://www.dmarc.org/note_well.html> > ) > -- Menotti Minutillo
_______________________________________________ dmarc-discuss mailing list [email protected] http://www.dmarc.org/mailman/listinfo/dmarc-discuss NOTE: Participating in this list means you agree to the DMARC Note Well terms (http://www.dmarc.org/note_well.html)
