Thanks again for all the help everyone. It wasn't too clear that the ruf would cause that overwhelming amount of reports. A simple enough fix :)
On Fri, Aug 10, 2012 at 1:58 PM, Steven M Jones <[email protected]>wrote: > On 08/10/2012 10:38, Menotti Minutillo, Jr. wrote: > >> >> Ah seems to be forensic. Any way of specifying in a dmarc record that I >> don't want them? >> >> > Remove the "ruf=" tag/value from your DMARC record if you do not want > sites to send you forensic reports. > > I've spoken to at least one other person/site that published a DMARC > record requesting forensic reports from the start. They were also > overwhelmed by the thousands of forensic reports that they started > receiving, and it wasn't clear to them that they were requesting and > getting two very different things. > > Seems like we need to work on making that a little clearer... > > --Steve. > > ______________________________**_________________ > dmarc-discuss mailing list > [email protected] > http://www.dmarc.org/mailman/**listinfo/dmarc-discuss<http://www.dmarc.org/mailman/listinfo/dmarc-discuss> > > NOTE: Participating in this list means you agree to the DMARC Note Well > terms > (http://www.dmarc.org/note_**well.html<http://www.dmarc.org/note_well.html> > ) > -- Menotti Minutillo
_______________________________________________ dmarc-discuss mailing list [email protected] http://www.dmarc.org/mailman/listinfo/dmarc-discuss NOTE: Participating in this list means you agree to the DMARC Note Well terms (http://www.dmarc.org/note_well.html)
