On Aug 10, 2012, at 2:58 PM, "Menotti Minutillo, Jr." <[email protected]> wrote: > I dont think I actually got the ruf recommendation from core DMARC spec docs > or the core DMARC site. If I would've looked at, say, the Gmail > recommendations, I definitely would've ignored it. > > I think any references to ruf in FAQs should have a quick warning, e.g. "Note > that specifying an ruf tag will ask receiving ISPs to report authentication > failures to the address specified in your domain's ruf tag as they happen. > This often causes an influx of reports and should only be enabled if you've > prepared some aggregation function."
Understood. Thanks for the pointers & suggestion. I'll open a ticket internally to make sure the published FAQs and the DMARC.ORG site contains quick warnings where appropriate. =- Tim
_______________________________________________ dmarc-discuss mailing list [email protected] http://www.dmarc.org/mailman/listinfo/dmarc-discuss NOTE: Participating in this list means you agree to the DMARC Note Well terms (http://www.dmarc.org/note_well.html)
