And yet you seem to want people on this list to get your mail, so I'm 
confused?

Scott K

On Friday, August 10, 2012 05:29:57 PM Franck Martin wrote:
> There is no documented consensus, and I would not document it that way
> anyhow.
> 
> I would prefer to say that Mailing lists, forwarders, third parties, which
> are more likely to be used by individuals more often than not break SPF
> and DKIM alignment, therefore DMARC. While DMARC is well suited for
> protecting transactional emails, one should be careful before enabling
> DMARC for domains used by individuals.
> 
> As a side note, I have enabled DMARC for linkedin.com and I'm not
> suffering much from these problems. On the contrary it is helping. We did
> not want to split our domain linkedin.com to linkedin-inc.com or some
> other things, because of the "brand" it represents for our sales people. I
> know at least another party in this group that has same feeling re "brand"
> of the main domain.
> 
> On 8/10/12 1:31 AM, "Roland Turner" <[email protected]> wrote:
> >All,
> >
> >I note that a consensus of sorts has formed in some places around the
> >non-use of quarantine and reject policies on domains which are used for
> >individual correspondence because of the loss of legitimate email that
> >will tend to result, however I've not been able to locate published text
> >on this (e.g. it's not mentioned in the draft, nor in the dmarc.org FAQ).
> >
> >Has this (or its contrary...) been documented as a consensus position
> >somewhere that I've missed?
> >
> >- Roland
> 
> _______________________________________________
> dmarc-discuss mailing list
> [email protected]
> http://www.dmarc.org/mailman/listinfo/dmarc-discuss
> 
> NOTE: Participating in this list means you agree to the DMARC Note Well
> terms (http://www.dmarc.org/note_well.html)
_______________________________________________
dmarc-discuss mailing list
[email protected]
http://www.dmarc.org/mailman/listinfo/dmarc-discuss

NOTE: Participating in this list means you agree to the DMARC Note Well terms 
(http://www.dmarc.org/note_well.html)

Reply via email to