Because I'm trying to make a point too ;) And you do receive my emails, so where is the problem :P
On 8/10/12 10:45 AM, "Scott Kitterman" <[email protected]> wrote: >And yet you seem to want people on this list to get your mail, so I'm >confused? > >Scott K > >On Friday, August 10, 2012 05:29:57 PM Franck Martin wrote: >> There is no documented consensus, and I would not document it that way >> anyhow. >> >> I would prefer to say that Mailing lists, forwarders, third parties, >>which >> are more likely to be used by individuals more often than not break SPF >> and DKIM alignment, therefore DMARC. While DMARC is well suited for >> protecting transactional emails, one should be careful before enabling >> DMARC for domains used by individuals. >> >> As a side note, I have enabled DMARC for linkedin.com and I'm not >> suffering much from these problems. On the contrary it is helping. We >>did >> not want to split our domain linkedin.com to linkedin-inc.com or some >> other things, because of the "brand" it represents for our sales >>people. I >> know at least another party in this group that has same feeling re >>"brand" >> of the main domain. >> _______________________________________________ dmarc-discuss mailing list [email protected] http://www.dmarc.org/mailman/listinfo/dmarc-discuss NOTE: Participating in this list means you agree to the DMARC Note Well terms (http://www.dmarc.org/note_well.html)
