Cool, thanks Tim. On Fri, Aug 10, 2012 at 3:05 PM, Tim Draegen <[email protected]> wrote:
> On Aug 10, 2012, at 2:58 PM, "Menotti Minutillo, Jr." <[email protected]> > wrote: > > I dont think I actually got the ruf recommendation from core DMARC spec > docs or the core DMARC site. If I would've looked at, say, the Gmail > recommendations, I definitely would've ignored it. > > I think any references to ruf in FAQs should have a quick warning, e.g. > "Note that specifying an ruf tag will ask receiving ISPs to report > authentication failures to the address specified in your domain's ruf tag > as they happen. This often causes an influx of reports and should only be > enabled if you've prepared some aggregation function." > > > Understood. Thanks for the pointers & suggestion. I'll open a ticket > internally to make sure the published FAQs and the DMARC.ORG site > contains quick warnings where appropriate. > > =- Tim > > > _______________________________________________ > dmarc-discuss mailing list > [email protected] > http://www.dmarc.org/mailman/listinfo/dmarc-discuss > > NOTE: Participating in this list means you agree to the DMARC Note Well > terms (http://www.dmarc.org/note_well.html) > > -- Menotti Minutillo
_______________________________________________ dmarc-discuss mailing list [email protected] http://www.dmarc.org/mailman/listinfo/dmarc-discuss NOTE: Participating in this list means you agree to the DMARC Note Well terms (http://www.dmarc.org/note_well.html)
