On Wed, Apr 9, 2014 at 11:43 AM, Scott Kitterman <[email protected]> wrote: > On April 9, 2014 9:41:51 AM EDT, Dave Crocker <[email protected]> wrote: >>On 4/9/2014 2:07 AM, Jonas Falck wrote: >>> Gents, >>> Perhaps this has been discussed, >>> what about just rewrite "from" header to actual mailing list, so you >>don't violate DMARC, >>> http://dmarc.org/faq.html#s_3 >> >> >>What about recipients' not being able to reply directly to the original >>author? >> > The "something like SRS" suggestion would address that issue. A unique From > would be assigned to each message/to each recipient. The MLM could then > relay messages sent to such an address back to the original sender and not to > the list. > > It's not simple, but I think it would allow mailing list functionality to be > largely as it is now.
It could promote junk address book clutter at webmail providers who helpful pre-populate your address book based on addresses you've received messages from or sent messages to. It also looks ugly, basically unintentional obfuscation. I'd be curious to see it if you decided to implement it, but it's not on my list. Cheers, Al -- Al Iverson | Chicago, IL | (312) 725-0130 Twitter: @aliverson / www.spamresource.com _______________________________________________ dmarc-discuss mailing list [email protected] http://www.dmarc.org/mailman/listinfo/dmarc-discuss NOTE: Participating in this list means you agree to the DMARC Note Well terms (http://www.dmarc.org/note_well.html)
