> Let me see if I understand this... you want to be > able to use a strong DMARC setting for your domain, > and let YMail send mail on behalf of your domain?
i want to use whichever DMARC setting suits me, and to allow trusted 3rd parties to send email on my behalf. > Most here are arguing against using strong DMARC > settings for personal use cases, you are arguing > for 3rd party support because you do want to use DMARC? what's the point of DMARC then? r we building a safer email, or r we just introducing protocols that can't be used cause they r not-to-be-used from the start? ppl r arguing against strong DMARC settings cause they r broken, not cause they r not useful. > Even if something like TPA-labels was established > to give third parties permission, I'm not clear > if/how that would affect YMail/Gmail's handling > of "custom from", "allow custom from if TPA-Label > exists at send time"? i don't see how or why would 3rd party support in DMARC change anything regarding ymail 3rd party email account capability. it wouldn't, cause it has little to do with it. ps. and no, i don't want to pay for google services. and i don't want to use my own MTA, cause that's not the point. i want to send email the way i trust it to be sent, using whatever ESP i trust. pps. by not including 3rd party support in DMARC, u actually have to build more than one complex workaround just to workaround DMARC's inefficiency, just as u specified in ur examples. it's trivially obvious to me that adding 3rd party support would be much less complex, much easier, with much better control... at least to majority of domains. is using aidbands better than actually patching up the patient? -- Vlatko Salaj aka goodone http://goodone.tk _______________________________________________ dmarc mailing list [email protected] https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/dmarc
