Murray S. Kucherawy writes: > To answer Stephen's question, I'm guessing you're referring to ATPS > (RFC 6541), use of CNAME to point to an externally-posted key, and > a key exchange where an operator give a third party a signing key. > If there are others, I'd like to know what they are.
Though they *are* solutions technically, I don't consider any of those "complete", in that I presume that Yahoo! has not offered any of those solutions to Mr. Salaj. And, for the reasons you give, confirmed by the fact that it hasn't happened yet, I believe they aren't going to do so any time soon. Steve _______________________________________________ dmarc mailing list [email protected] https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/dmarc
