On 6/29/2018 11:13 AM, John Levine wrote:
In article <CABuGu1rh7sjVQQPwUdySE9v4xFEa2=drsfiawirk1w8d6fv...@mail.gmail.com>
you write:
Anything that comes close to 'do whatever you want with this
information' demonstrates NON-standardization.
Not at all. The point of a standard is to say here is what you do if
you want to interoperate. Trying to figure out how to recover when
someone else doesn't follow the spec is a fool's errand, since there
are more ways to misimplement a spec than any of us can imagine.
I suppose we could put in a sentence or two reminding people that
unlike DKIM, the list of tags in the spec are the only ones allowed in
an ARC header, so don't try to invent new ones.
That's pretty tight. No room for exploration and experimentation, and
imeo, this protocol will need more than a few explorations to see how
useful it might be.
--
HLS
_______________________________________________
dmarc mailing list
[email protected]
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/dmarc
