Hello Jouni, folks,
Here are few more comments:
DMM can be used to realise such a distributed deployment
model, by distributing forwarding functions at optimal location; for
example, closer either to the mobile user or the corresponding node.
We had already talked about that: s/mobile user/mobile node.
o Enhanced gateway & mobility anchor selection and re-selection: define
protocol solutions for a gateway and mobility anchor selection that
go beyond what has been, for example, described in RFC 6097. The
solution should also define a mechanism for anchor re-selection that
allow
preserving ongoing mobility sessions in a single administrative domain.
o Forwarding path and signalling management: the mobility agent that
handles
the mobility signalling interacts with the network elements in the DMM
network
for managing the forwarding state associated with a mobile node's IP
traffic.
These two functions may or may not be collocated. Furthermore, the
forwarding
state may also be distributed into multiple network elements instead of
a
single anchor like network element. Define required protocol extensions
to
allow described forwarding path and signalling management.
GW selection and data-path management signaling may be defined in the same
"solution" document. In at least some cases these are provided as part of the
same solution set. They may also be separable, maybe, but we shall not be hung
up on producing separate documents for these… The solution discussions will
guide us… (no specific change required on the above text, more on this below…)
The milestones are missing any document that defines the "data-path management
signaling" (what's mentioned above). And like I said before, that's "the"
product of this WG IMO. It'd of course be supplemented by GW selection and
mobility state exposure bits to complete the picture.
Let's add another milestone:
Nov 2014 - Submit 'Forwarding path and signaling management' as a working group
document. To be Proposed Standard.
Mar 2015 - Submit 'Forwarding path and signaling management' submitted to the
IESG. To be Proposed Standard.
Cheers,
Alper
On May 27, 2014, at 11:50 AM, Jouni Korhonen wrote:
>
> Now that the gap analysis I-D is almost on the stage of leaving the WG and
> the requirements I-D has almost completed IESG, it would be time to return to
> the rechartering topic.
>
> First, the latest revision can be found at:
> https://github.com/jounikor/dmm-re-charter
>
> Second, have a look at it. There are few changes proposed by Alper eons ago
> and corrected milestones pointed by Behcet.
>
> Third, let us get this finally done..
>
> - Jouni
>
> 4/22/2014 3:55 PM, Jouni Korhonen kirjoitti:
>> Folks,
>>
>> Sorry for letting this topic to rot in a dark for the couple of last
>> weeks. I'll crank out a revision shortly..
>>
>> - Jouni & Dapeng
>
> _______________________________________________
> dmm mailing list
> [email protected]
> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/dmm
_______________________________________________
dmm mailing list
[email protected]
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/dmm
