Bechet,
5/29/2014 11:52 PM, Behcet Sarikaya kirjoitti:
Hi Jouni,
I was looking at the charter text and noticed one important issue. The
charter seems to be stuck with the good old anchor think. Almost all
text is about anchoring, anchor selection, anchor reselection, and so
on.
However in the past several months, we have seen in Alper's events,
presentations which seem to have no anchor.
I don't see any active draft that talks about the anchors.
In view of this, my question is how are we going to go ahead with this
charter and meet the deadlines?
I (myself) see still value dragging along some anchoring stuff just to
allow smoother migration from current deployed models toward less
centralized architectures.
But you are right that we should not get stuck on those.. and that has
not been the intent either.
Or else, are we better off with a charter text which is much less
dependent on the anchors, something which could make it possible to
progress one of those proposals??
You are welcome to propose concrete text & change snippets to the
current charter text.
- Jouni
Regards,
Behcet
On Tue, May 27, 2014 at 3:50 AM, Jouni Korhonen <[email protected]> wrote:
Now that the gap analysis I-D is almost on the stage of leaving the WG and
the requirements I-D has almost completed IESG, it would be time to return
to the rechartering topic.
First, the latest revision can be found at:
https://github.com/jounikor/dmm-re-charter
Second, have a look at it. There are few changes proposed by Alper eons ago
and corrected milestones pointed by Behcet.
Third, let us get this finally done..
- Jouni
4/22/2014 3:55 PM, Jouni Korhonen kirjoitti:
Folks,
Sorry for letting this topic to rot in a dark for the couple of last
weeks. I'll crank out a revision shortly..
- Jouni & Dapeng
_______________________________________________
dmm mailing list
[email protected]
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/dmm
_______________________________________________
dmm mailing list
[email protected]
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/dmm
