Jouni and Alper
On 2014/05/31, at 2:08, Jouni Korhonen <[email protected]> wrote: > Agree. +1 The text looks good to me. I am eager to have solution discussion. ryuji > 5/30/2014 8:57 AM, Alper Yegin kirjoitti: >> IMO, solutions that do not rely on "anchors" are welcome. >> Even though the charter uses that term, we are not hung up on solutions that >> have "anchors" >> Besides, remember I made an attempt to refine the term with an additional >> one "deflector"… So, we do need to have some discussions around that >> eventually. >> But I don't think we need to have that right now in the context of the >> charter text. >> As long as people understand that anchor-less solutions are welcome for >> discussion, and we may eventually refine the term, we can move forward with >> the current text -- I'd say. >> >> Alper >> >> >> >> On May 30, 2014, at 12:03 AM, Jouni Korhonen wrote: >> >>> Bechet, >>> >>> 5/29/2014 11:52 PM, Behcet Sarikaya kirjoitti: >>>> Hi Jouni, >>>> >>>> I was looking at the charter text and noticed one important issue. The >>>> charter seems to be stuck with the good old anchor think. Almost all >>>> text is about anchoring, anchor selection, anchor reselection, and so >>>> on. >>>> >>>> However in the past several months, we have seen in Alper's events, >>>> presentations which seem to have no anchor. >>>> >>>> I don't see any active draft that talks about the anchors. >>>> >>>> In view of this, my question is how are we going to go ahead with this >>>> charter and meet the deadlines? >>> >>> I (myself) see still value dragging along some anchoring stuff just to >>> allow smoother migration from current deployed models toward less >>> centralized architectures. >>> >>> But you are right that we should not get stuck on those.. and that has not >>> been the intent either. >>> >>>> Or else, are we better off with a charter text which is much less >>>> dependent on the anchors, something which could make it possible to >>>> progress one of those proposals?? >>> >>> You are welcome to propose concrete text & change snippets to the current >>> charter text. >>> >>> - Jouni >>> >>>> >>>> Regards, >>>> >>>> Behcet >>>> >>>> >>>> On Tue, May 27, 2014 at 3:50 AM, Jouni Korhonen <[email protected]> >>>> wrote: >>>>> >>>>> Now that the gap analysis I-D is almost on the stage of leaving the WG and >>>>> the requirements I-D has almost completed IESG, it would be time to return >>>>> to the rechartering topic. >>>>> >>>>> First, the latest revision can be found at: >>>>> https://github.com/jounikor/dmm-re-charter >>>>> >>>>> Second, have a look at it. There are few changes proposed by Alper eons >>>>> ago >>>>> and corrected milestones pointed by Behcet. >>>>> >>>>> Third, let us get this finally done.. >>>>> >>>>> - Jouni >>>>> >>>>> 4/22/2014 3:55 PM, Jouni Korhonen kirjoitti: >>>>> >>>>>> Folks, >>>>>> >>>>>> Sorry for letting this topic to rot in a dark for the couple of last >>>>>> weeks. I'll crank out a revision shortly.. >>>>>> >>>>>> - Jouni & Dapeng >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> _______________________________________________ >>>>> dmm mailing list >>>>> [email protected] >>>>> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/dmm >>> >>> _______________________________________________ >>> dmm mailing list >>> [email protected] >>> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/dmm >> > > _______________________________________________ > dmm mailing list > [email protected] > https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/dmm _______________________________________________ dmm mailing list [email protected] https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/dmm
