Agree.
5/30/2014 8:57 AM, Alper Yegin kirjoitti:
IMO, solutions that do not rely on "anchors" are welcome.
Even though the charter uses that term, we are not hung up on solutions that have
"anchors"
Besides, remember I made an attempt to refine the term with an additional one
"deflector"… So, we do need to have some discussions around that eventually.
But I don't think we need to have that right now in the context of the charter
text.
As long as people understand that anchor-less solutions are welcome for
discussion, and we may eventually refine the term, we can move forward with the
current text -- I'd say.
Alper
On May 30, 2014, at 12:03 AM, Jouni Korhonen wrote:
Bechet,
5/29/2014 11:52 PM, Behcet Sarikaya kirjoitti:
Hi Jouni,
I was looking at the charter text and noticed one important issue. The
charter seems to be stuck with the good old anchor think. Almost all
text is about anchoring, anchor selection, anchor reselection, and so
on.
However in the past several months, we have seen in Alper's events,
presentations which seem to have no anchor.
I don't see any active draft that talks about the anchors.
In view of this, my question is how are we going to go ahead with this
charter and meet the deadlines?
I (myself) see still value dragging along some anchoring stuff just to allow
smoother migration from current deployed models toward less centralized
architectures.
But you are right that we should not get stuck on those.. and that has not been
the intent either.
Or else, are we better off with a charter text which is much less
dependent on the anchors, something which could make it possible to
progress one of those proposals??
You are welcome to propose concrete text & change snippets to the current
charter text.
- Jouni
Regards,
Behcet
On Tue, May 27, 2014 at 3:50 AM, Jouni Korhonen <[email protected]> wrote:
Now that the gap analysis I-D is almost on the stage of leaving the WG and
the requirements I-D has almost completed IESG, it would be time to return
to the rechartering topic.
First, the latest revision can be found at:
https://github.com/jounikor/dmm-re-charter
Second, have a look at it. There are few changes proposed by Alper eons ago
and corrected milestones pointed by Behcet.
Third, let us get this finally done..
- Jouni
4/22/2014 3:55 PM, Jouni Korhonen kirjoitti:
Folks,
Sorry for letting this topic to rot in a dark for the couple of last
weeks. I'll crank out a revision shortly..
- Jouni & Dapeng
_______________________________________________
dmm mailing list
[email protected]
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/dmm
_______________________________________________
dmm mailing list
[email protected]
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/dmm
_______________________________________________
dmm mailing list
[email protected]
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/dmm
