IMO, solutions that do not rely on "anchors" are welcome. Even though the charter uses that term, we are not hung up on solutions that have "anchors" Besides, remember I made an attempt to refine the term with an additional one "deflector"… So, we do need to have some discussions around that eventually. But I don't think we need to have that right now in the context of the charter text. As long as people understand that anchor-less solutions are welcome for discussion, and we may eventually refine the term, we can move forward with the current text -- I'd say.
Alper On May 30, 2014, at 12:03 AM, Jouni Korhonen wrote: > Bechet, > > 5/29/2014 11:52 PM, Behcet Sarikaya kirjoitti: >> Hi Jouni, >> >> I was looking at the charter text and noticed one important issue. The >> charter seems to be stuck with the good old anchor think. Almost all >> text is about anchoring, anchor selection, anchor reselection, and so >> on. >> >> However in the past several months, we have seen in Alper's events, >> presentations which seem to have no anchor. >> >> I don't see any active draft that talks about the anchors. >> >> In view of this, my question is how are we going to go ahead with this >> charter and meet the deadlines? > > I (myself) see still value dragging along some anchoring stuff just to allow > smoother migration from current deployed models toward less centralized > architectures. > > But you are right that we should not get stuck on those.. and that has not > been the intent either. > >> Or else, are we better off with a charter text which is much less >> dependent on the anchors, something which could make it possible to >> progress one of those proposals?? > > You are welcome to propose concrete text & change snippets to the current > charter text. > > - Jouni > >> >> Regards, >> >> Behcet >> >> >> On Tue, May 27, 2014 at 3:50 AM, Jouni Korhonen <[email protected]> >> wrote: >>> >>> Now that the gap analysis I-D is almost on the stage of leaving the WG and >>> the requirements I-D has almost completed IESG, it would be time to return >>> to the rechartering topic. >>> >>> First, the latest revision can be found at: >>> https://github.com/jounikor/dmm-re-charter >>> >>> Second, have a look at it. There are few changes proposed by Alper eons ago >>> and corrected milestones pointed by Behcet. >>> >>> Third, let us get this finally done.. >>> >>> - Jouni >>> >>> 4/22/2014 3:55 PM, Jouni Korhonen kirjoitti: >>> >>>> Folks, >>>> >>>> Sorry for letting this topic to rot in a dark for the couple of last >>>> weeks. I'll crank out a revision shortly.. >>>> >>>> - Jouni & Dapeng >>> >>> >>> _______________________________________________ >>> dmm mailing list >>> [email protected] >>> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/dmm > > _______________________________________________ > dmm mailing list > [email protected] > https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/dmm _______________________________________________ dmm mailing list [email protected] https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/dmm
